It is 1994, and Bill Gates is sitting in a red leather chair somewhere over the Pacific Ocean, surrounded by cardboard boxes. Not metaphorical boxes. Actual cardboard boxes, stuffed with books — biology textbooks, physics papers, economics manuscripts, technical reports from engineers he’ll never meet. The plane is a private jet but the setup looks like a graduate student’s apartment. Gates is on his way to a cabin in the woods of Hood Canal in Washington State for what he calls Think Week: seven days alone, no Microsoft staff, no meetings, no family. Just him and a stack of paper that would break a normal person’s back.
He does this twice a year. Has done it since the 1980s. The cabin has no internet connection by design. His meals are brought by a caretaker who slides trays under the door and disappears without speaking. Gates will read up to eighteen hours a day, sleep, and read again. By the end of the week he will have consumed a hundred or so papers and memos, written detailed notes on most of them, and produced a handful of ideas that will shape Microsoft’s direction for the next year. Some of the most consequential decisions in the history of the technology industry — including a 1995 memo called “The Internet Tidal Wave” that pivoted the entire company toward the web — came out of one of these solitary weeks in a wooden cabin with a stack of cardboard boxes and a man who bills his discipline routine as his most competitive advantage.
The popular image of Bill Gates is the nerdy kid who got lucky with DOS, made $100 billion, and now gives money away. That image leaves out the actual story, which is considerably more interesting: a person who built one of the most disciplined cognitive systems in the history of American business, maintained it across sixty-plus years, and applied it with equal intensity to software, global health, climate change, and agricultural development in the developing world. The Cognitive Load System — Gates’s approach to managing mental energy as a strategic resource — is the architecture behind all of it, and it is more applicable to normal life than most people assume. His practice of deliberate practice is legendary. His ability to work a problem is the stuff of Silicon Valley mythology. The Cognitive Load System is internal locus of control taken to its architectural conclusion — not just believing your effort matters, but engineering your entire day around the premise that cognitive energy is your highest-value resource. But the system underneath those skills is what actually drives the results.
The Person: Who Gates Actually Is Before the Routine
At thirteen, his parents enrolled him at Lakeside School in Seattle, which had one of the first computer terminals in any American school. Gates became obsessed. He and Paul Allen would sneak into the computer lab at night, hack into the school’s system to get more computing time, and eventually exploit a bug in a General Electric computer network to use commercial time for free. When the company discovered the exploit, they offered the boys free computing time in exchange for helping debug their software. Gates was fifteen. He understood — at fifteen — that his brain was an asset and that protecting and developing it was the highest leverage activity available to him.
He went to Harvard in 1973. He left in 1975 without finishing his degree to start Microsoft. His mother, Mary Gates, was not pleased but eventually used her connection — she was on the board of the United Way alongside IBM CEO John Opel — to help arrange a meeting that landed Microsoft its foundational IBM contract. Gates has acknowledged this in interviews. The bootstraps mythology doesn’t hold in his case, and he doesn’t particularly claim it does. What he does claim is that once he had his shot, he worked with a ferocity that his Harvard classmates found alarming.
At twenty-something, running the early Microsoft, he memorized the license plate numbers of every employee’s car so he could track who was working late. He would walk the parking lot and know, at a glance, whose car was still there at 11 PM. This is not a story about surveillance. It is a story about a man whose identity was so fused with cognitive output that he couldn’t imagine why a person wouldn’t want to be in the office thinking hard problems at 11 PM. He thought vacation was a sign of weakness until he was in his thirties. He has since revised that view substantially, but the underlying engine — the deep conviction that how you spend your mental energy determines your outcomes — has never changed.
The pivot from Microsoft to philanthropy didn’t soften the system. If anything, it sharpened it. The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, launched in 2000 with an initial $28 billion commitment, works on problems orders of magnitude more complex than operating systems: eradicating polio, developing malaria vaccines, improving agricultural productivity in sub-Saharan Africa, addressing sanitation for the 2.3 billion people who lack basic toilets. Gates brought the same Cognitive Load System that built Microsoft to problems where the stakes are literally whether children live or die. He read his way into becoming a credible voice on global health. He hired world-class scientists and then did the homework to challenge them as an intellectual peer. The cabin with the cardboard boxes didn’t stop. It just changed subjects.
There is a detail about Gates in the Microsoft years that most profiles omit because it complicates the narrative. He was not simply a disciplined genius. He was a disciplined genius who was often brutal, occasionally wrong, and spectacularly bad at interpersonal management in his first decade. He reportedly told employees their ideas were “the stupidest thing I’ve ever heard” in meetings. He had zero patience for vague thinking or unprepared presentations. He once allegedly told a product manager that a proposal was “brain-dead” and walked out. His intensity was real, but its early expression was the intensity of someone who had never been told no — the particular confidence that comes from being the smartest person in every room you occupied from age thirteen onward. The Cognitive Load System, in the early Microsoft years, was also a social tax machine: Gates extracted enormous cognitive output from himself and his team and ran on fumes of interpersonal consideration. The discipline was real. The self-awareness came later. By his own account in interviews with journalist Steven Levy and others, he learned to listen better in his forties than he had in his thirties. The system evolved. The core didn’t.
The System: Gates’s Daily Routine and the Science Behind It
Breakfast is minimal and fast. Gates has publicly noted he likes cheeseburgers, which is not a health performance hack but is perhaps a reminder that not everything in a successful person’s day is optimized. He spends time with his children in the mornings when possible, a habit that became more intentional after his divorce from Melinda French Gates in 2021. He has acknowledged in interviews that during the Microsoft years he was a poor family presence, and that recalibration has been deliberate.
The core of his workday is reading. Gates reads approximately fifty books per year — not as a performance flex, but as active information acquisition. He takes notes in the margins. He writes summaries. He thinks of each book as a source to interrogate, not a credential to collect. This approach is supported by research from the University of Waterloo: a 2018 study by Lachlan Mackinnon and colleagues published in Applied Cognitive Psychology found that elaborative interrogation — asking “why” and “how” questions while reading — produces retention rates roughly twice those of passive reading. Gates’s margin-noting and summarizing are the practical application of exactly this technique. The Cognitive Load System treats information not as a thing to acquire but as a resource to process. There is a difference, and it is the difference between a person who has read five hundred books and a person who has integrated fifty.
His meetings are structured with unusual specificity. Microsoft veterans describe his style as relentless interrogation. The Harvard Business Review has documented how knowledge workers who protect deep-work blocks produce qualitatively superior output to those in meeting-saturated schedules — Gates’s architecture pre-dates that research by decades: he comes to every meeting having read every relevant document, asks questions that make clear he has done the preparation, and expects others to have done the same. His assistant of many years, Leslie Koch, noted that Gates’s calendar was organized around thinking time first and meeting time second — the inverse of most executives, who fill their calendars with meetings and try to think in the gaps. He protects blocks of uninterrupted cognitive work the way most people protect their weekends.
The science on this is unambiguous. Cal Newport at Georgetown University, drawing on research by Sophie Leroy at the University of Minnesota (published in Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 2009), documented what Leroy called “attention residue”: when you switch from Task A to Task B, part of your cognitive capacity remains stuck on Task A, degrading performance on B. Meeting-heavy days produce maximum attention residue. Gates’s calendar architecture — deep work blocks first, meetings clustered and bounded — minimizes residue and maximizes the quality of thinking per hour. This is not a personality quirk. It is cognitively optimal scheduling, and it is accessible to anyone with the willpower to defend it.
Afternoons at the Gates Foundation involve problem review sessions that Gates runs with unusual depth. He has been described by foundation staff as the kind of donor who will ask a malaria researcher about the specific mechanism by which artemisinin-resistant parasites evade treatment, and know enough to evaluate the answer. This depth is not natural; it is earned through the reading regimen. He does the homework. Every afternoon session is, in effect, the output of months of accumulated reading on whatever topic is on the agenda. This is excellence at the system level, not the performance level — the difference between a person who is always ready and a person who frantically prepares for each specific thing.
There is a mirror moment in this for most people in knowledge work. You have probably been in a meeting where someone’s question made clear they hadn’t read the pre-read. You have probably also been that person. The pressure of a full schedule makes pre-reading feel optional, then aspirational, then gone. The kaizen principle applies here with particular force: a 1% daily improvement in reading retention compounds into something substantial, and it starts with protecting the time for it to happen at all. Gates’s system produces the opposite dynamic by design: reading time is structural, not aspirational. It is in the calendar before the meetings are. The meetings fill around it the way water fills around rocks. When reading is aspirational — something you’ll get to after the real work is done — it disappears. In the Cognitive Load System, reading is the real work. Everything else is the distribution mechanism for what the reading produces.
One more element of the daily structure that rarely gets mentioned: Gates keeps a notepad for capture. Not a phone, not a productivity app. A physical notepad, carried everywhere, for the ideas and questions that surface during the day and would otherwise evaporate. He has spoken about this in various interviews as a mechanism for not losing the cognitive residue of a good thinking session — the half-formed idea at the end of a chapter, the question that surfaces mid-meeting that deserves a proper answer. The notepad is a buffer between the mental and the permanent. It is also a commitment device: writing something down is a small act of agency that separates important thoughts from the river of passing ones. This is not a Gates-specific innovation. Newton did it. Darwin did it. Einstein filled notebooks the way other people fill trash cans. The specific value in Gates’s use is that it closes the loop between his deep reading sessions and his working memory — he transfers notepad items into his summaries, which means the capture system feeds directly into the processing system. Nothing falls through.
Physical exercise is consistent but not extreme. Gates plays tennis — and the humility of being a mediocre tennis player at sixty-nine, publicly and without apparent embarrassment, is itself a signal worth noting. The growth mindset requires tolerance for being bad at things, and Gates models it in his recreational choices. He plays tennis — he learned as an adult, which he uses as evidence that skills can be acquired at any age if you’re willing to tolerate the awkwardness of being a beginner. He golfs. He was not an athlete in his youth and has never pretended otherwise. The exercise is functional: cardiovascular health, stress management, the kind of physical baseline that supports the cognitive work he considers primary. Exercise physiologist John Ratey at Harvard Medical School documented in his book Spark (2008), drawing on multiple controlled trials, that aerobic exercise increases levels of BDNF (brain-derived neurotrophic factor), which enhances neuroplasticity, learning speed, and memory consolidation. Gates’s exercise routine, modest by fitness-culture standards, is sufficient to activate these mechanisms. He’s not optimizing his VO2 max. He’s maintaining the biological substrate of his Cognitive Load System.
Sleep is reportedly 7 to 8 hours, structured around the same principle as everything else: protect the cognitive asset. He has said he cannot function well on less than 7 hours and doesn’t try. He reads before sleep, fiction included — a practice supported by a 2013 study in Brain Connectivity and also connected to the well-documented link between sleep quality and cognitive performance. by Gregory Berns and colleagues at Emory University, which found that narrative fiction reading increases neurological connectivity in regions associated with language processing and sensory simulation for days after the reading. Gates’s bedtime fiction habit isn’t escapism. It’s cross-training for the cognitive system. The Berns study (2013, Brain Connectivity) found neural connectivity enhancements persisting for five days after literary fiction reading sessions — a biological case for the habit that Gates practices intuitively.
The discipline required to maintain this structure is not exotic, but it is non-trivial. Gates has the resources to enforce it: an assistant who manages his calendar, an organization that accommodates his thinking preferences, and decades of personal authority that make it socially normal for him to say “I need two uninterrupted hours in the morning before I take any meetings.” Most people lack the authority but not the capacity. A mid-level manager with a cooperative team can protect a morning focus block. A freelancer controls their own calendar entirely. A parent with school-age children has a window between drop-off and the first obligation. The system scales to the constraints, and the constraint most people are actually fighting is not their schedule but their habit of filling every open slot with reactive work before the protective behavior becomes automatic. The phone is usually the culprit — not in a moralistic way, but in a mechanical one. The first hour of the day spent on a phone is a cognitive warm-up for distraction rather than depth, and reversing that habit is the first adjustment the Cognitive Load System requires.
The crown jewel of the system remains Think Week. Twice a year, Gates retreats to the same Hood Canal cabin for seven days of uninterrupted reading and thinking. The format has evolved over the decades but the core hasn’t changed: no meetings, no obligations, deep focus, and a stack of the most challenging material he can find. The 1995 “Internet Tidal Wave” memo that redirected Microsoft toward the web was written during Think Week. The early strategic insights that shaped the Gates Foundation’s focus on polio eradication emerged from Think Week reading. The system scales. When you give a disciplined reader seven days without interruption, the output is not proportionally larger than seven normal days. It is qualitatively different. The quality of thinking that emerges from deep, sustained, uninterrupted focus is not available in fragments, which is why the cabin exists and why Gates has protected the format for forty-plus years.
The Results: What This System Actually Produced
In 1980, Gates negotiated the IBM deal for MS-DOS. This was not impulsive action — it was the output of years of reading and thinking about where computing was headed. The product didn’t exist — Microsoft didn’t have an operating system. Gates licensed QDOS (Quick and Dirty Operating System) from Seattle Computer Products for $50,000, renamed it MS-DOS, and delivered it to IBM within weeks. The insight that made this deal extraordinary was not technical: it was Gates’s recognition, built through reading and thinking, that the future of computing was software licensing, not hardware. IBM thought they were buying a commodity product. Gates understood that whoever owned the software layer owned the industry. He was right by about thirty years and $600 billion.
The “Internet Tidal Wave” memo in May 1995 was twenty-six pages written over Think Week after Gates had systematically read everything he could find about the emerging web. It recognized the internet as an existential threat and opportunity, redirected Microsoft’s entire product roadmap, and arrived approximately two years before most technology executives understood what was happening. Netscape went public in August 1995. Gates’s memo predated it by months. Reading and thinking did that, not instinct.
On the philanthropic side, the Gates Foundation has spent more than $60 billion since 2000. Global polio cases have fallen from 350,000 annually in 1988 to single digits in recent years — a reduction driven in part by Foundation-funded vaccination campaigns that Gates had read his way into understanding at a mechanistic level. In 2010, Gates co-founded the Giving Pledge with Warren Buffett, committing more than half his wealth to philanthropy and convincing over 230 other billionaires to do the same. The current Gates net worth hovers around $100 billion, which means he has given away more than he has retained. His annual letter from the Foundation — which he writes himself — is read by global health policy makers as primary source material, not celebrity commentary. He earned that credibility through the same system he used to build Microsoft: disciplined reading, deep focus, sustained engagement with the hardest problems he can find.
The personal dimension matters too. Gates has been public about the failure of his marriage — and about the realization that emotional discipline and cognitive discipline are not the same skill, and that mastering one doesn’t automatically develop the other and about the realization, in retrospect, that his cognitive system consumed everything around it during the Microsoft years. His children grew up with a father who was physically present but mentally elsewhere. He has described working to correct that since leaving day-to-day Microsoft operations in 2008. The system is not without costs. That is part of the record.
The Adaptation: How a Normal Person Applies the Cognitive Load System
You do not have a cabin in Hood Canal. You might not even have a quiet office. That’s fine — the Cognitive Load System doesn’t require a cabin. It requires a set of habits over discipline-willpower so the structure exists even when motivation doesn’t. You probably cannot read eighteen hours a day or spend a week per quarter in cognitive isolation. Here is what you can actually do.
The Cognitive Load System has three operating principles, and each one scales down to ordinary life. The first is protect your best thinking time. Gates identifies his peak cognitive hours and fills them with his hardest work. Most people fill their peak hours with whatever email arrived first. Identify a two-hour block — morning is typical, but this is individual — and protect it from meetings, notifications, and reactive tasks. Do your hardest thinking there. The research on this is settled: peak performance windows are finite and non-renewable within a given day. Filling yours with administrative work is a choice, and it is an expensive one.
The second principle is read to process, not to collect. Gates reads fifty books a year with notes and summaries. You might read twelve. The number is irrelevant. What matters is whether you’re processing or collecting. After each chapter — or each article, each report, each piece of content you consume — take three minutes and write one sentence: what is the single most applicable thing I just learned? This is a minimal version of elaborative interrogation. It takes almost no time. It doubles retention. The deliberate practice framework applies here: reading without reflection is passive exposure, not skill building.
The third principle is create a personal Think Week. Gates takes two seven-day retreats annually. You can start with one day. One Saturday per quarter where you don’t check social media, don’t attend to anything reactive, and spend the day with a stack of books or papers on a problem that actually matters to you. The specific format is less important than the principle: deep, uninterrupted engagement with important ideas produces qualitatively different thinking than shallow engagement with many things simultaneously. If you do this once per quarter for a year, you will have produced four days of clear, deep thinking in a year that most people never produce at all. The compound effect of that over five years is significant.
One mirror moment: most people who admire Gates’s reading habit focus on the fifty books and miss the system. They read a book a month for three months and wonder why their life hasn’t changed. The books aren’t the point. The processing is the point. Gates’s intellectual edge isn’t that he has read more than you. It’s that he has integrated more than you. The Cognitive Load System is about throughput — not how much information enters, but how much usable thinking exits. Protecting your peak hours, processing what you read, and creating periods of deep focus are the three levers that determine that throughput.
You can adjust all three starting today, with no additional resources, no cabinet in the woods, and no private jet full of cardboard boxes.
A practical starting protocol: for one week, track how you spend your peak cognitive hours. Not how you intend to spend them — how you actually spend them. Write it down at the end of each day. Most people discover they are spending their best mental hours on email, Slack, and low-priority meetings. That audit alone is usually enough motivation to make the first adjustment. Replace the first thirty minutes of your morning, before email, with whatever your most important thinking task is. Do that for two weeks. The difference in output will be measurable. That is the Cognitive Load System at its minimum viable dose.
The second mirror moment: most people who try to install a reading habit kill it by starting too large. Gates reads fifty books a year because he has been reading fifty-plus books a year for forty years. You probably aren’t starting there. One book per month is twelve per year. One article or chapter per day is approximately the same information volume as Gates processes in a typical afternoon. The quantity is not the variable. The consistency and processing are. A no-zero-days system applied to reading — even ten pages every day without exception — compounds into something meaningful over a year that irregular bursts of reading never reach. And a journaling habit layered on top — three sentences after every session summarizing what you processed — transforms the input into integrated knowledge rather than collected memory that fades within a week.
The third mirror moment is about Think Week specifically. The idea of a week alone with books sounds appealing to most people and impossible to most schedules. So they don’t do it. They wait for the week when they have seven uninterrupted days and no obligations. That week never comes, and three years pass without a single day of deep, intentional thinking about the problems that actually matter to them. The minimum viable Think Week is a Sunday afternoon. Four hours, no phone, a question you’ve been meaning to think hard about, and two or three pieces of material relevant to that question. Do that once per month and you have produced twelve thinking sessions per year that would not otherwise exist. Across five years, that’s sixty thinking sessions — roughly the equivalent of ten Think Weeks — that your schedule said were impossible and your priorities said were necessary. The prioritize-and-execute principle applies here with unusual clarity, and so does the capacity for calm under cognitive load — because thinking hard under self-imposed pressure requires a regulated nervous system, not just good intentions: if it does not get scheduled, it does not get done.
FAQ About Bill Gates’s Discipline Routine
- First, the unit of discipline is your cognitive energy, not your time — a full calendar is not a productive day if your best thinking happened between meetings.
- Second, systems beat intensity: Gates’s fifty-books-per-year reading habit at age sixty-nine is the same system he ran at thirty-five, not a heroic burst. Consistent, sustainable practice compounds.
- Third, isolation is a tool, not a luxury — the twice-yearly Think Week isn’t a vacation. It is scheduled deep work, and the results justify the time.
What is Bill Gates’s daily routine? Gates wakes between 7 and 7:30 AM and begins with an hour of treadmill exercise while watching educational content. His workday is organized around deep reading and focused thinking blocks, with meetings clustered rather than spread across the day. He reads roughly fifty books per year, takes notes on all of them, and twice annually retreats to a cabin in Hood Canal, Washington for Think Week — seven days of uninterrupted reading and strategic thinking that has shaped major decisions at both Microsoft and the Gates Foundation.
What is Bill Gates’s Think Week, and how does it work? Think Week is a twice-yearly solo retreat Gates has practiced since the 1980s. He goes to a cabin on Hood Canal in Washington State with no staff and no meetings. A caretaker delivers meals without speaking. Gates reads up to 18 hours per day, working through submitted papers, books, and technical reports. The famous 1995 “Internet Tidal Wave” memo — which pivoted Microsoft toward the web ahead of the industry — was written during Think Week. The format exploits the cognitive research finding that deep, sustained, uninterrupted focus produces qualitatively different thinking than the same hours spent in fragments.
How many books does Bill Gates read per year, and what is his method? Gates reads approximately fifty books per year, with active annotation and margin notes throughout. He writes summaries after finishing each book. This approach reflects the elaborative interrogation technique documented in cognitive psychology research — actively processing information rather than passively absorbing it roughly doubles retention. He publishes book reviews at gatesnotes.com and has credited his reading habit as the primary mechanism by which he develops expertise in fields outside his original training, including global health, climate science, and agricultural development.
What does Bill Gates’s Cognitive Load System mean for ordinary people? The Cognitive Load System — Gates’s approach to treating mental energy as a strategic resource — has three applicable principles regardless of your resources. First: identify your peak cognitive hours and protect them for your hardest thinking, not for email. Second: read to process and integrate, not to collect titles — take three minutes after every chapter to write one applicable takeaway. Third: schedule at least one period per quarter of deep, uninterrupted thinking on a problem that matters to you. These principles scale down to any schedule and produce compounding returns on intellectual output over months and years.
Did Bill Gates sleep very little, and did that contribute to his success? No. Gates has explicitly rejected the sleep deprivation model of success. He reports sleeping 7 to 8 hours per night and has said he cannot function well on less. During the early Microsoft years he was reportedly obsessive about employee hours, but he has since credited this as partly counterproductive. His current position is that adequate sleep is non-negotiable maintenance for the cognitive system, not a luxury. This is consistent with sleep science: studies from Harvard Medical School, including work by Robert Stickgold on memory consolidation, confirm that sleep deprivation degrades precisely the higher-order reasoning and creative problem-solving that Gates’s work depends on.
How did Bill Gates become an expert in global health and disease? Through the same system he used to master software. Gates began reading deeply in global health in the late 1990s as he transitioned his focus to philanthropy. He hired world-class scientists and then did the reading to challenge them as an intellectual peer. Foundation staff have described him asking researchers detailed questions about disease mechanisms, treatment resistance, and epidemiological modeling — questions that reflect months of systematic reading, not delegated briefings. This is the Cognitive Load System applied to a new domain: protect the thinking time, read to process not collect, and create the space (Think Week) for the synthesis to emerge. He essentially retrained as an applied public health thinker in his forties while also running one of the world’s largest charitable organizations.
What are the biggest lessons from Bill Gates’s discipline routine for building daily habits? Three.
For a framework on building the underlying habits that support this kind of discipline, the deliberate practice model and a structured 30-day discipline protocol are the most direct entry points.
How does Gates’s approach compare to other billionaire discipline routines? The comparison that matters most is with Warren Buffett, Gates’s closest friend and intellectual counterpart. Buffett reportedly reads 500 to 1,000 pages per day and has said that compound interest is the most powerful force in the universe — a principle he applies equally to investing and to knowledge. Both men protect enormous blocks of unstructured reading time in schedules that could easily be consumed by meetings. Elon Musk and Jeff Bezos represent a different model: more meetings, more operational involvement, with deep thinking happening in shorter, more intense bursts. Gates and Buffett’s model produces different cognitive advantages — broader pattern recognition, deeper synthesis — while Musk and Bezos’s model produces faster operational velocity. Neither is universally superior. The question is which one matches your work. Gates’s Cognitive Load System is most valuable for people whose primary output is judgment and synthesis rather than execution and speed.
NOT JUST READING ABOUT IT ›
Join the Wolf Pack — mentorship and accountability for men who are done thinking about change
The Integration: How This Connects to Everything Else
The deliberate practice framework and the Cognitive Load System are designed to run together. Deliberate practice requires high-concentration focus sessions with specific feedback. The Cognitive Load System creates the conditions — protected hours, processed information, periodic deep retreats — that make those sessions possible at their highest quality. You cannot do deliberate practice on a depleted cognitive battery. You cannot maintain a Cognitive Load System without the discipline to work problems rather than process feelings about them.
If the reading habit is the entry point, the journaling practice is the processing mechanism. Gates’s margin notes and summaries are an external journaling system — a way of converting input into integrated knowledge rather than collected trivia. Running both together produces the kind of compounding intellectual capital that makes decisions qualitatively better over years. That is the Gates advantage in its most transferable form: not his IQ, not his Harvard connections, not his luck. The system. Which is yours to run, starting now.
Related: Peter Thiel's Discipline Routine: What He Does Daily
Related: Leonidas's Discipline Routine: What He Did Daily
Related: LeBron James's Discipline Routine: What He Does Daily
Editorial StandardsCorrectionsMedical DisclaimerAbout Our ContentAffiliate DisclosureSite Map