I’m not talking about people who’ve never thought about it. I’m talking about men who think about it regularly and still don’t really know. Who can generate a list of things they want but suspect, in the quiet moments, that the list is assembled from external signals — from what successful-looking people in their social environment appear to want, from what they were told they should want growing up, from the cultural narratives of masculinity and success that were the water they swam in before they were old enough to choose their water. Knowing what you want in some deep and genuine sense is hard work. And most men never do it, because the culture doesn’t ask them to.
This is EP390. Why most men have no idea what they actually want, what produces that confusion, and — critically — what the actual work of figuring it out looks like. This is one of the conversations I’ve been wanting to have for a while because I think it’s at the root of a lot of the dissatisfaction and drift that I see in men who by every external metric are doing fine. Let’s get into it.
The Social Construction of Men’s Desires
We need to start with the honest acknowledgment that much of what any of us think we want is socially constructed — assembled from the environment we grew up in, the models of success and failure we were exposed to, the rewards and punishments that shaped our behavior from childhood onward. This is true for everyone, but it operates with specific features for men that are worth understanding.
Traditional masculine socialization — which still operates, even in modified forms, across virtually every cultural context — rewards men for externalizing. For achievement that can be measured and compared. For stoicism about internal states (don’t show weakness, don’t admit confusion, don’t express need). For knowing what you want and pursuing it decisively, because admitting uncertainty is admitting weakness. The effect of this socialization is that men learn to perform wanting things with great confidence, while the actual work of identifying genuine desire gets systematically discouraged.
The developmental psychologist Dan Siegel calls the resulting pattern “interpersonal neurobiology of dissociation” — the brain literally disconnects from the signals of internal states when those signals have been consistently associated with negative social feedback. You get good at not knowing what you feel. Good enough that it stops feeling like not knowing — it just feels like there’s nothing there to know. The absence of access to your internal states gets mistaken for the absence of internal states. And from that platform, answering “what do I want?” with anything more than the socially approved menu of answers becomes genuinely impossible.
This isn’t theory. Ask the men in your life what they want, and specifically what they want that isn’t on the standard success checklist. Most of them will look at you strangely and then generate some version of the standard checklist. Very few will have done the work of asking themselves, seriously and repeatedly, what they genuinely want that’s specific to who they actually are. The few who have done that work tend to be the most purposeful, most satisfied, and most genuinely useful to the people around them. The work pays off. Very few people do it.
The Default Settings: What Men Inherit Without Choosing
Let me be specific about the inherited defaults — the wants that most men are operating from without having consciously chosen them.
Status. The desire for status — for recognition, for social rank, for the feeling of being respected and seen as successful — is both biological (it’s primate social machinery that predates culture by millions of years) and culturally amplified to the point of distortion. Men are trained from childhood to care enormously about relative status, and most male social behavior makes more sense when you understand it as status optimization. The problem isn’t wanting status — it’s confusing status for what you actually want. Most men who are driving themselves to exhaustion in pursuit of status don’t actually want status. They want the things they’ve been told status will provide: security, respect, love, belonging, freedom. All of those are legitimate wants. Status is a proxy for them, and often a poor one. But because the proxy is the thing you were taught to pursue, it’s the thing you end up pursuing — sometimes at the expense of the actual things.
Achievement. The want to build, to accomplish, to create something — this is real and worth honoring. But men are also taught to want achievement as an end in itself, divorced from any genuine assessment of what they want to achieve and why. The man who spends forty years building a successful career in a field he has no passion for is not an extreme outlier. He’s following the logic of the default setting: get good at something, get better at it, get paid well for it, get respected for it. The question of whether this is a life he’d actually choose — whether the thing he’s building serves something he genuinely cares about — often never gets asked.
Romantic success. Men are socialized to want the approval of women, or of the culture’s sexual ideal of a woman, in a way that gets mixed up with their sense of masculine adequacy. This creates a specific confusion between wanting genuine intimate partnership — which is a real and deep human need — and wanting the external validation signal of having an attractive partner. Men who’ve untangled this distinction tend to have dramatically different and more satisfying relationship lives than men who haven’t. Men who haven’t tend to pursue relationships in ways that are more about the signal than the substance, and then be bewildered when the signal doesn’t deliver the satisfaction they expected.
The Fear That Masquerades as Want
The man who is obsessively pursuing financial security — working sixty hours a week, taking no risks, maxing out every savings vehicle, refusing to spend on experiences or people — might believe he wants financial security. He might. But it’s worth asking whether what he’s actually driven by is the fear of poverty, the fear of his parents’ financial failures, the fear of being seen as a failure. The fear-version of the want never gets satisfied, because no amount of financial security is ever enough to fully quiet an anxiety that’s rooted in something deeper. The genuine-want version has a natural satiation point. The fear-version doesn’t.
The same pattern shows up in career ambition, physical development, social status pursuit, and even relationship behavior. When the drive comes from genuine desire — “I want to build this thing because it genuinely matters to me and I’m genuinely excited by the work” — there’s a quality of aliveness and engagement that sustains it across difficulty. When the drive comes from fear — “I have to succeed or else” — there’s a quality of driven desperation that produces results sometimes but never produces satisfaction, because the results can’t address the underlying fear.
Distinguishing between these requires the kind of honest self-examination that masculine socialization specifically discourages. You have to ask uncomfortable questions. Not “what do I want?” as an aspirational question, but “what happens to my sense of self if I don’t get this?” If the answer involves collapse, shame, or the fundamental invalidation of your worth as a person — that’s the fear speaking, not the want. Wants can go unmet and you remain intact. Fears can go unaddressed indefinitely, producing an increasingly anxious and driven life that looks successful from the outside and feels hollow from the inside.
The Authenticity Gap: Who You Actually Are vs. Who You’ve Become
Most men, by the time they’re in their thirties or forties, have accumulated a substantial gap between who they actually are and who they’ve become in response to their environment. The gap isn’t fraudulent, exactly — they genuinely are the person they’ve become. But that person has been shaped so thoroughly by external pressures, incentives, and expectations that the question of what they’d be like in the absence of those pressures — who they’d be if they’d been fully free to become themselves — is hard to answer.
Psychologist James Marcia’s work on identity development describes this as the difference between “foreclosed” identity and “achieved” identity. Foreclosed identity is when you commit to a set of values, roles, and life structure without going through the necessary process of genuine exploration and choice — you inherit your identity from your environment without ever questioning whether it fits. Achieved identity is when you’ve gone through that exploration — including the difficult and often uncomfortable phase of identity moratorium, where you’re genuinely uncertain about who you are and what you want — and arrived at commitments you’ve actually chosen.
Most men go through the motions of identity development without doing the actual work of identity exploration. You take the career path that made sense given where you grew up and what was available and what your family expected. You end up in relationships that fit a certain social template. You live in places and communities that fit the life trajectory rather than being specifically chosen. None of this is wrong — life presents itself one circumstance at a time, and you make the best decisions available at each juncture. But at some point, a man who hasn’t done the work of explicitly examining and choosing his life has essentially been living someone else’s life — the life that the combination of his genetics, his environment, his social pressures, and his accumulated habits produced, rather than a life he’s examined and genuinely endorsed.
The Body as a Source of Genuine Wanting
- Genuine excitement: lift in the chest, forward lean, quickening of attention, expansiveness
- Anxious striving: tight chest, driven quality, relief only when achieving rather than during the pursuit
- Genuine ease: settling into a decision, the sense of rightness, energy rather than depletion
- Fear-driven avoidance masking as preference: the feeling of relief when you escape the scary thing, rather than attraction toward the preferred thing
Antonio Damasio’s research on somatic markers — documented in Descartes’ Error — showed that people with damage to the brain regions that integrate bodily signals with decision-making become profoundly poor decision-makers, even though their rational faculties remain intact. They can analyze options, understand tradeoffs, and articulate the pros and cons of choices with great sophistication. But they can’t make decisions well, because they’ve lost access to the felt sense of what matters. The body’s signals aren’t noise that interferes with rational decision-making. They’re information that rational decision-making needs to function well.
The practical implication: when you’re trying to understand what you actually want, pay attention to your body’s responses. The signals to learn to distinguish:
Learning to read these signals, rather than overriding them with socially-trained thought, is a significant part of the work of figuring out what you actually want.
The Envy Compass
Here’s a specific and underrated diagnostic tool: pay attention to who and what you envy. Not with shame, but with curiosity. Envy — properly understood — is not primarily a moral failing. It’s an information signal. You envy people who have what you secretly want. The specificity of your envy tells you something precise about what you’re missing.
The philosopher Alain de Botton, who wrote extensively about envy in Status Anxiety, argues that we tend to envy people who are close to us in relevant ways — not the billionaire whose life is incomprehensibly different, but the former colleague who seems to have found work they genuinely love, or the friend who has the kind of intimate relationship you secretly want but haven’t allowed yourself to want explicitly. The target of the envy is instructive. It points to something you actually want but haven’t given yourself permission to pursue.
I’ve used this as a diagnostic tool with men I know who are stuck. Tell me who you most envy and why, and I’ll often get more clarity about their genuine desires in ten minutes than I’d get from an hour of direct questioning. The envy bypasses the socially constructed answer and points directly at the genuine want. Once named, the envy loses much of its toxic quality — it becomes a pointer rather than a wound. “I envy his freedom” is information about your desire for freedom. “I envy her creative work” is information about your desire for creative expression. Follow the envy to what it’s pointing at, not to the person it’s attached to.
The Work of Figuring It Out
- If I woke up tomorrow with the same capabilities but none of the expectations others have of me, what would I spend the next year doing?
- What activities, relationships, or contexts make time disappear — where you look up and an hour has passed but it felt like minutes?
- Who do you envy most consistently, and what specifically about their life generates the envy?
Until you make the unconscious conscious, it will direct your life and you will call it fate. — Carl Jung. Nowhere is this more true than in the domain of desire. The wants you’ve never examined direct your choices just as powerfully as the wants you’ve explicitly acknowledged — just less transparently, and with less opportunity for genuine evaluation.
The practices that help. Regular journaling, specifically structured around the question “what am I actually feeling and wanting right now?” Not what you should be feeling or wanting — what you actually are. This practice, done consistently over months, builds the interoceptive vocabulary that most men have never developed. You start to notice distinctions between states that previously seemed undifferentiated. You start to catch yourself performing an emotion rather than experiencing it. You start to notice the gap between what you’re saying you want and what you feel in your body when you imagine having it.
Periods of voluntary simplicity. The clarity about what you genuinely want often comes when the noise of modern consumption — material, social, informational — is reduced. Extended solitude. A camping trip alone. A weekend without phone or social media. Time in nature at a pace that allows the nervous system to settle. These aren’t luxuries. They’re diagnostics. What remains when the noise stops? What do you actually think about, seek, and feel alive in pursuit of, when nothing is required of you? That’s useful data.
Therapy or coaching with a good practitioner who will push past your socially constructed answers. This is the fastest path for most people, because a skilled practitioner can see the patterns you can’t see in yourself and ask the questions that your self-protective defenses won’t let you ask. The men who are most resistant to this path are usually the men who most need it — because the resistance itself is part of the pattern that’s keeping them from knowing what they want.
Three diagnostic questions to sit with this week:
What Happens When You Do Know
I want to end this section before the FAQ with something that might seem obvious but isn’t: knowing what you want doesn’t solve everything. It’s not the end of difficulty or the beginning of smooth sailing. But it changes the nature of the difficulty in a way that is genuinely transformative.
When you’re living from someone else’s wants — inherited, fear-driven, socially constructed — the difficulty feels arbitrary and meaningless. You’re working hard for goals that don’t resonate, sacrificing things that matter for things that turn out not to satisfy, living at an angle to your genuine self in ways that produce a persistent low-grade dissatisfaction that can be hard to name but impossible to ignore.
When you’re living from genuine wants — examined, chosen, genuinely yours — the difficulty has a different quality. It’s still difficulty. The obstacles are still real. The costs are still real. But they’re oriented toward something that actually matters to you, and that orientation gives everything a quality of meaning that arbitrary difficulty never has. Viktor Frankl called this “tragic optimism” — the capacity to find meaning and affirmation even in unavoidable suffering. That capacity begins with knowing what your life is actually in service of. And you can’t know that until you’ve done the work of figuring out what you actually want.
Listener FAQ
Then you’re dealing with a real tension that deserves honest engagement rather than either comfortable denial or dramatic dismantling of your life. Many people discover genuine wants that exist in tension with legitimate commitments — to family, to financial obligations, to relationships. The answer isn’t to abandon the commitments, and it isn’t to suppress the wants. It’s to understand both clearly enough to navigate intelligently. Sometimes the answer is making room for the genuine want within existing constraints. Sometimes it’s a longer-term plan that moves toward it. Sometimes it’s genuinely grieving what you can’t have while recommitting to what you’ve chosen. All of these require clarity about what you actually want. The confusion is worse than any of the options.
Q: My partner has strong opinions about what I should want. How do you handle external pressure on this process?
By protecting the inquiry. The work of understanding what you want is yours to do, and it needs to be done from the inside before it can be shared or negotiated with anyone else. A partner’s expectations and needs are real and deserve genuine respect. But you can’t negotiate authentically about what you want in a partnership if you don’t actually know what you want. Do the work of figuring it out first. Then bring genuine clarity to the conversation with your partner, rather than starting the conversation before you know your own position. Partners who push back on your genuine wants deserve serious engagement. Partners who push back on your exploration of your genuine wants are presenting a different kind of problem.
Q: Isn’t this all very individualistic? What about wanting things that are about community, service, other people?
Absolutely, and that’s important to name. Some of the deepest and most genuine wants people have are relational and communal — wants for meaningful contribution, for belonging, for the sense of mattering to specific people. These are just as real as the wants for individual achievement or personal satisfaction, and in many cases they’re more reliable sources of lasting fulfillment. The point isn’t that individual wants are more valid than relational or communal ones. The point is that many men confuse what they’ve been told they should want with what they actually want — and some of the most valuable discoveries in this work are men realizing that what they genuinely want is more relational, more service-oriented, and less individually achievement-focused than the culture told them it should be.
Q: I’m in my fifties. Is it too late to do this work?
No. The work is available at any age, and there are aspects of it that become possible in midlife that weren’t available earlier. The research on midlife development — Erik Erikson’s “generativity vs. stagnation” stage, Daniel Levinson’s work on midlife transition — consistently shows that midlife is a natural inflection point where the question of genuine wants becomes more urgent and more available. The mortality awareness of midlife focuses the attention in useful ways. The achievement of some worldly success — or the accumulation of enough failures to release the illusion that success will solve everything — clears away some of the noise. Many of the most profound reckonings with what one genuinely wants happen in midlife. The work is harder in some ways, because more life has been built around the inherited defaults. But it’s also richer, because there’s more actual experience to draw on.
Q: How do you tell the difference between a genuine want and something you want because it’s novel or exciting right now?
Time and depth. Genuine wants tend to be persistent — they show up across different contexts, different moods, different life circumstances. They have a consistency and an urgency that novelty-driven excitement doesn’t have. Novel excitement has a specific quality of brightness that fades quickly. Genuine wants have a quality of depth and steadiness even when they’re not currently available. The test is: after the novelty wears off, after the initial excitement subsides, does the want remain? Does it show up in how you spend your attention when you’re not deliberately directing it? Does it appear in your envy, your dreams, your most honest conversations? If yes, it’s probably genuine. If it depends on the novelty of the moment, it probably isn’t.
The Permission Problem: Wanting Things You Were Told Not to Want
There’s a specific and underappreciated dimension of the “what do I actually want” question that deserves its own treatment: the permission problem. Many men discover, in the process of genuine self-inquiry, that they want things they were explicitly or implicitly told they weren’t supposed to want. Not harmful things — just things that don’t fit the template. A man raised in a high-achievement family who actually wants a quiet, craft-oriented life with no ambition for status or scale. A man raised in a working-class community who actually wants a life of ideas and intellectual engagement, which his community might code as pretentious or elitist. A man whose peer group defines success through professional achievement and income who actually finds genuine meaning in creative work that pays modestly. A man who genuinely wants to be a devoted primary caregiver for his children in a way that isn’t culturally normalized for men in his context.
The discovery of these wants is often followed immediately by the suppression of them, because acting on them would require violating the expectations of people whose approval matters — parents, partners, peer groups, communities. The cost of disappointing these people is real. The cost of living a life oriented toward their expectations rather than your genuine wants is also real, just slower and more diffuse. The work of figuring out what you want always eventually confronts this permission question: are you willing to want what you actually want, even if important people in your life wanted something different for you?
Psychologist Murray Bowen’s concept of differentiation of self describes this capacity — the ability to maintain your own genuine position, values, and needs in the face of emotional pressure from important relationships without either merging with the other person’s expectations or cutting off from the relationship entirely. High differentiation means you can genuinely love people whose expectations of you you’re not going to fulfill. Low differentiation means you either comply with the expectations (at the cost of your genuine self) or cut off from the relationship (at the cost of genuine connection). Building the capacity for high differentiation — to remain in genuine relationship while living from your genuine self — is some of the most important developmental work available to any adult. The men who have done it tend to be both more authentic and more genuinely connected than the men who haven’t.
The Midlife Reckoning and What It Actually Means
The midlife crisis has become a cultural joke — the red sports car, the younger companion, the desperate attempt to recapture lost youth. But underneath the clichéd manifestations is a genuine developmental event that psychologists take seriously and that most men experience in some form between their late thirties and early fifties. Carl Jung called it the “afternoon of life” and argued that it required a fundamentally different orientation than the morning — where the morning was properly oriented toward external achievement and social establishment, the afternoon was properly oriented toward interiority, meaning, and the integration of everything that had been left behind in the rush of early achievement.
Daniel Levinson’s research on male adult development, documented in The Seasons of a Man’s Life — a longitudinal study of forty men tracked across several decades — found that virtually every man in his sample experienced a significant period of questioning and transition in midlife. Not the red sports car variety necessarily, but a genuine confrontation with the questions: Is this the life I actually want? Is what I’ve been building actually worth the cost? What have I sacrificed that I can still recover, and what is genuinely gone? These aren’t questions of dysfunction — they’re the questions that a functioning adult should be asking at midlife, because by midlife there is enough lived experience to actually evaluate the choices that were made in young adulthood, many of which were made on insufficient information and social pressure rather than genuine self-knowledge.
The men who navigate midlife most successfully — who emerge from it with renewed direction and genuine deepening rather than either denial or destructive acting out — tend to be the ones who take the questions seriously. Who create the space to sit with the discomfort of genuine self-examination. Who are willing to change course where the examination reveals significant misalignment, without abandoning everything that has been genuinely good. And who bring their partners, their communities, and their genuine selves along for the process rather than experiencing it as a solitary, shameful crisis. The midlife reckoning, properly engaged, is one of the most profound opportunities for genuine self-knowledge available in a human life. Most men either avoid it or are swept away by it. The few who meet it consciously often describe it as a second birth — and they mean it literally.
Values Clarification as a Daily Practice
Figuring out what you want isn’t a single inquiry you do once and then carry forward as a settled conclusion. It’s an ongoing practice that requires regular tending, because you change, your circumstances change, and what was genuinely true about what you wanted at thirty may be partially or substantially different at forty or fifty. The person who did genuine self-inquiry at twenty-five and then stopped paying attention to their own evolution may find themselves at forty five living from a genuine self that was genuine twenty years ago but has quietly shifted into something different without their noticing.
Values clarification as a daily practice is simpler than it sounds. The most effective version: at the end of each day, spend five minutes asking two questions. First: today, when did I feel most alive, most genuinely engaged, most fully myself? Second: today, when did I feel most constricted, most like I was going against my grain, most at odds with who I actually am? These aren’t rhetorical questions — they’re data collection. Over months of consistent practice, the patterns become unmistakable. The contexts, activities, and relationships that consistently appear in the first column tell you something real about what genuinely nourishes you. The ones that consistently appear in the second column tell you something real about where your life is out of alignment with your genuine self.
The daily practice doesn’t replace deeper periodic inquiry — the quarterly review, the extended reflective retreats, the therapy or coaching work. But it maintains a live connection to your own experience in a way that periodic deep inquiry alone cannot. You’re not waiting for the annual review to notice that something has shifted. You’re tracking the evolution in real time, which gives you much more information and much earlier warning when significant alignment issues are developing.
The Desire Map: Translating Emotional Truth Into Direction
Danielle LaPorte’s work on desire — specifically her framework of “core desired feelings” as the primary compass for life decisions — is worth engaging with seriously despite (or perhaps because of) its origins in a more explicitly emotional and intuitive framework than the analytical approaches I usually work with. Her argument: most goal-setting starts with external outcomes (what do I want to achieve?) and works backward to check whether the achievement will produce the desired internal state. Her approach inverts this: start with the internal states you most genuinely desire to feel, and then evaluate potential goals and commitments by whether they’re likely to produce those feelings. The filter becomes “will pursuing this actually produce the internal experience I’m seeking?” rather than “is this the right thing to achieve?”
The reason this framework is useful in the context of “what do men actually want” is that it cuts through the externalized metrics that most men use to evaluate their choices — money, status, achievement, physical appearance — and asks directly about the underlying emotional and experiential reality those metrics are supposed to represent. What you actually want, most of the time, is not a specific income level or a specific title or a specific body composition. What you actually want is the felt experience that you believe those things will produce — the sense of freedom, significance, vitality, belonging, or peace that you associate with those external achievements. The external achievements may or may not produce those feelings. Identifying the feelings directly and asking what would actually produce them often reveals paths that the standard success checklist systematically obscures.
The exercise is simple and surprisingly clarifying: sit with each area of your life — work, relationships, health, creative expression, daily experience — and ask not “what do I want to achieve here?” but “how do I want to feel here?” Write the words that come. Not the words you think you should want to feel, but the words that have genuine emotional resonance when you sit quietly with the question. Alive. Connected. Free. Purposeful. Grounded. Peaceful. Seen. Creative. Useful. Then look at your current life against those desired feelings and ask honestly: is how I’m spending my time and energy actually producing these experiences? The gap between the desired feelings and the current experience is exactly the territory that needs attention.
That’s EP390. The work of figuring out what you actually want is some of the most important and most neglected work that most men could do. Not because self-knowledge is the end goal — it isn’t. But because everything you’re building, everything you’re sacrificing, everything you’re investing your one life in, needs to be oriented toward something genuinely yours. Otherwise you’re building someone else’s life with your one chance. That seems like a poor trade.
Editorial StandardsCorrectionsMedical DisclaimerAbout Our ContentAffiliate DisclosureSite Map