It’s 2:47 in the morning, and there’s a man lying in the dark holding a phone that hasn’t lit up in six days. He’s not expecting her to call — past that particular delusion, or telling himself he is. Holding it because her contact photo still sits there, third in his favorites, and scrolling to it, looking at her face for a few seconds, something in the chest unclenches. The way a fist unclenches once it’s been closed so long the muscle simply gives out. Three or four seconds staring at the screen, and something settles. Then it collapses again, worse than before, because now the nervous system’s been reminded exactly what it’s missing, and the withdrawal hits like a freight train through the ribcage.
Except here’s the thing nobody wants to hear: he’s not missing her.
He’s missing the version of himself that existed in her presence. The man he became when she looked at him a certain way. The man whose voice dropped half an octave saying come here. The man who knew — or thought he knew — exactly who he was, because her eyes confirmed it every morning.
That man doesn’t exist right now. And that’s what’s actually doing the damage.
The Moment: What “Missing” Actually Is
This is the part nobody covers when handing out standard breakup advice. The hit the gym, delete her number, get back out there playbook sounds reasonable on paper and does exactly nothing to address what’s actually happening underneath. Because what’s happening isn’t grief in the traditional sense. It’s an identity crisis. And identity crises don’t respond to push-ups.
Consider how much of daily life got organized around being her partner. Not just logistics — the shared calendar, the standing Thursday dinner — but the psychological architecture underneath. Understanding himself as a man who was chosen. Wanted. A man with a place in the world, confirmed nightly by the warm body next to his. He didn’t just lose a relationship. He lost a mirror that told him who he was, and now he’s navigating a world with nobody left to reflect him back to himself.
That’s the void. Not her absence. The absence of the self that got built around being hers.
Worth naming this precisely, because the name changes everything. This isn’t lovesickness. Isn’t grief, at least not primarily. It’s an Identity Collapse — the sudden, total failure of the external structure a man had been using to answer “who am I?” Once the problem gets understood as Identity Collapse rather than her absence, the effort to solve the wrong problem stops.
The Mechanism: What Your Brain Is Actually Doing
The brain doesn’t distinguish between losing a partner and losing access to a survival resource. This isn’t poetry. It’s neuroscience, and it explains why a man feels like he’s dying when, objectively, medically, physically, he’s fine. The prefrontal cortex knows the relationship’s over. The limbic system thinks the tribe abandoned him and winter’s coming.
During the relationship, the brain got regular hits of oxytocin, dopamine, serotonin. Not occasionally — daily. Every touch, every shared laugh, every time she reached for his hand in the car or pressed her forehead against his chest when tired. The brain adapted to that supply the way it adapts to any consistent chemical input — recalibrating baseline, building new receptor sites, rewiring reward circuitry around the expectation of her presence. Research on social bonding and neuroplasticity shows pair-bonded relationships produce measurable changes in the brain’s reward architecture — changes that don’t reverse the instant the relationship ends.
Then the supply stopped.
The insomnia, the chest tightness, the inability to eat or the compulsion to eat everything, the fog rolling in at 4 p.m. and not lifting until midnight — that’s withdrawal. Literal, neurochemical withdrawal. The evidence from fMRI research shows a breakup activates the same brain regions as substance withdrawal. The anterior cingulate cortex. The insular cortex. Identical circuits.
So when someone says just get over it, understand the actual ask: telling a man in clinical withdrawal to stop being addicted. The pain is real. The chemistry is real. Until the ache in the chest gets understood as having a biological basis — the body running an actual detox — every normal withdrawal symptom gets misread as proof she was the soulmate, that the relationship was irreplaceable, that this feeling won’t ever return for anyone else.
It might return for someone else. But this specific withdrawal won’t repeat, because withdrawal is keyed to a particular supply. The intensity of what’s being felt isn’t a measure of how special the love was. It’s a measure of how dependent the nervous system became.
Helen Fisher, the biological anthropologist at Rutgers who’s done more brain-scan work on romantic love and heartbreak than nearly anyone alive, states it plainly: romantic love is an addiction. Not metaphorically. Neurochemically. The same dopaminergic pathways that make cocaine rewarding make love rewarding. The same withdrawal mechanisms that make quitting cocaine brutal make losing love brutal. Fisher’s team scanned the brains of people freshly rejected by romantic partners and found ventral tegmental area activation — the brain’s primary reward circuitry — identical to active craving states in drug addiction. The subjects weren’t pining poetically. They were craving neurochemically, involuntarily, with no ability to think their way out.
Stan Tatkin, psychologist and developer of the Psychobiological Approach to Couple Therapy, adds a second layer. In secure couple systems, he argues, each partner essentially becomes a primary regulator of the other’s nervous system. Two people, quite literally, physiologically stabilizing each other. Her presence didn’t just feel emotionally good — it actively downregulated stress response, lowered cortisol, stabilized heart rate variability. Lose her, and it isn’t just companionship gone. The primary nervous system regulator is gone. The body now runs all that regulation solo, and it hasn’t figured out how yet.
This is why the first few weeks feel like insanity. Not going crazy — running an outdated map of reality. The brain keeps looking for her in the apartment, the bed, the passenger seat. Keeps anticipating her laugh at something funny just thought of. Neuroscientist Lucy Brown, who worked alongside Fisher on the breakup brain-scan studies, calls this the phantom partner effect — the neural map of the relationship built over months or years of daily experience doesn’t dismantle in a week. The map keeps generating expectations reality keeps failing to meet, and every failure produces a fresh hit of grief.
The map updates eventually. Neural plasticity guarantees it. The update just takes time. Meanwhile there’s a phantom limb sitting where identity used to be.
The Lie: Why Standard Breakup Advice Makes Identity Collapse Worse
Every syllable of that’s already been heard, probably tried. Maybe the number got deleted and then reconstructed from memory over forty-five minutes. Maybe the gym happened and the crying happened afterward in the shower, because the post-workout endorphin crash left a hole shaped exactly like her. Maybe the busyness happened and revealed itself as distraction with a heartbeat — the second the motion stops, the void reopens wider than before.
Standard breakup advice fails because it treats the symptom — her absence — instead of the disease, which is the fragility of an identity that depended on her presence in the first place. Deleting her number doesn’t rebuild a sense of self. Hitting the gym doesn’t teach a man who he is when nobody’s watching. Dating again before the identity work is done just means attaching to the next woman with the same desperate architecture, hunting for a new mirror to replace the shattered one.
And time heals all wounds? Time doesn’t heal Identity Collapse. Time just puts distance between a man and the acute phase. Skip rebuilding an identity that doesn’t depend on someone else’s presence, and there’s a version of him at fifty-seven still getting a hollow feeling in the stomach when a certain song plays on the radio. Not because the love was that powerful — because the void never got filled with anything real.
There’s a dangerous middle phase nobody warns about — somewhere between the acute shock and whatever comes next — where the pain dulls just enough to become treacherous. Not fetal-position-on-the-floor anymore. Functional. Going to work. Maybe laughing at something a coworker says and then feeling guilty about it, as if joy were a betrayal.
But the void hasn’t been filled. It’s been papered over with routine. And that’s when the genuinely bad decisions happen. That’s when a 1 a.m. text says something that can’t be taken back. That’s when sex with someone he doesn’t care about happens because physical contact temporarily quiets the alarm. That’s when the relationship starts getting romanticized — every fight airbrushed out, every incompatibility, every night she made him feel small — until the version being grieved bears no resemblance to the relationship that actually existed.
The dangerous middle is where most men get permanently stuck. Not weakness — the culture simply hands them no framework for what’s happening. Women have language for this. Women have friends who sit with them and name it. Men get a buddy who says plenty of fish in the sea, buys a beer, and changes the subject to baseball. He nods, drinks the beer, tells himself he’s fine, and carries the unprocessed Identity Collapse for another decade until it detonates in the next relationship — or in a midlife crisis everyone calls sudden but was actually decades in the making.
Here’s what actually happened at the identity level, for anyone honest enough to look. Somewhere in the first six months — maybe the first night she slept over and he woke with her hair across the pillow, thinking yes, this is who I’m supposed to be — a version of himself started forming that only existed in relation to her. Not deliberately. Not consciously. The way a vine grows toward sunlight. Not by decision — that’s just what vines do.
He started seeing himself through her eyes. Calibrating behavior to her reactions. What made her laugh, what made her pull away, what earned that expression that felt like sunlight on his face. Small, nearly imperceptible edits accumulated. He started liking the music she played in the kitchen. Adopted her opinions on certain restaurants, certain friends, certain questions he’d never cared about before. None of this is shameful — it’s human. Pair-bonding involves identity merger, and it happens to everyone. The problem is how much of himself got surrendered in the process — and whether there was a self underneath the merger that could survive its collapse.
For a lot of men, the answer is: barely. Because a lot of men never built a self that wasn’t contingent on external validation in the first place. Father’s approval, coach’s approval, boss’s approval, her approval — the source shifts, the architecture stays the same. I know who I am because someone else’s reaction tells me who I am. When the most important reaction vanishes — when she stops looking at him — the result isn’t just sadness. It’s erasure.
The most dangerous thing about losing someone isn’t the grief. It’s discovering the person he thought he was only existed in her presence, and without her, he’s standing in a room full of mirrors, all of them blank.
The Protocol: The Identity Rebuild After a Breakup
- Run the Identity Audit. Sit down and take an honest accounting of which parts of life are genuinely his — chosen deliberately, maintained independently — and which were built around her, for her, or in response to her. The friend group: his, or assembled through the relationship? The hobbies: things he’d do if nobody ever watched? The morning routine: shaped around his needs, or a shared domestic rhythm that no longer exists? The goals: things he actually wants, or things pursued because they fit the shared story? This audit reveals gaps. Real ones. Maybe not a single close friendship exists that wasn’t mediated through the relationship. Maybe the entire weekend structure was built around couple activities. Maybe — the one that stings most — he can’t name three things he’s passionate about that have nothing to do with another person. Good. Those gaps are the blueprint. They show exactly what needs building. Not rebuilding. Building — because some of it never existed to begin with.
- Reclaim physical territory. Parts of life were occupied — physically, emotionally, psychologically — and those territories need reclaiming. Made his again. The restaurant of the first date: go alone. Order what he wants. Let the memory exist without letting it own the room. The music she introduced: listen to it, decide honestly whether it’s liked for its own sake or because it echoes her. The shared city: walk through it. Not to wallow, not for grief tourism, but to establish that these streets belong to him too. Every time a space that used to belong to them gets entered and survived, every time the solo restaurant meal doesn’t end the world, the neural map gets rewritten. The nervous system learns these places don’t belong to the relationship anymore. The relationship was a tenant. The lease is up. The space is his.
- Build solitude capacity. There’s a difference between solitude and loneliness that most people collapse into one category. Loneliness is the panicked sense that something’s missing, that he’s been exiled. Solitude is the deliberate practice of being with himself and discovering the company is enough. Loneliness is reactive. Solitude is chosen. The capacity for genuine solitude — not gritted-teeth endurance of being alone, but actual enjoyment of one’s own presence — is the single most reliable marker of a man whose self isn’t built on sand. It’s learned the way anything hard gets learned: repetition, discomfort, the slow accumulation of evidence that survival is possible where destruction once seemed certain. Dinner alone, sitting with the self-consciousness until it passes. A weekend with no plans, resisting the urge to fill every hour with noise. A walk with no headphones. In the silence, in the gap between activities, the grief will find him. So will the voice that says you’re not enough on your own. The job is to let it speak without obeying it.
- Find the friends who can handle this. Complete isolation won’t work. Not because someone else needs to fix it, but because men are needed who can sit present with the pain without flinching. Men who won’t change the subject when told about waking at 3 a.m. with her name as the first thought. The epidemic of male loneliness is real: millions of men have colleagues and drinking buddies but not one person they’d call when the bottom drops out. If those men aren’t already in his life, the breakup just revealed a gap that was always there. Real friendships don’t form by performing strength. They form by being honest about weakness — saying the thing that isn’t supposed to be said, and seeing who stays in the room afterward. The ones who stay are his people.
- Build something that exists independent of an audience. Last and most important: identify what actually matters at the bone level — beneath performance, beneath what sounds impressive, beneath what she approved of. What gets valued when nobody’s watching? What would get pursued if the result stayed invisible to everyone, including future partners? Start there, even small, even embarrassing. Build from the ground up, because a man who knows who he is doesn’t need anyone to tell him. The gym matters here — not as distraction, but as a domain where the feedback is direct, the results belong to him, and nobody else’s opinion is required to know whether he showed up.
That’s the question. Not how do I get her back. Not how do I stop hurting. Not when will I feel normal again. Who am I, independent of her reflection and her validation and her presence — and can that person stand on his own?
He’ll resist this with everything he has. He’ll resist because the answer might be I don’t know. And I don’t know who I am lands in a man’s gut like a sledgehammer, because men are supposed to know. Men are supposed to have direction, a mission, a center. And here he is, sitting in a dark apartment at 3 a.m., unable to tell anyone what he actually wants from his own life if they paid him.
That’s fine. That’s the starting point. Not the failure. The starting point.
The Identity Rebuild runs in five stages. Not fast, doesn’t photograph well, but it works:
This isn’t a six-week process. Six to twelve months minimum, and the early weeks run genuinely brutal. Expect relapse. Somewhere around week six or eight, once something resembling equilibrium starts to show up, there’ll be a moment of checking her Instagram, or driving past the apartment, or texting something that reads casual but is actually a flare gun fired into the dark. And when she doesn’t respond, or answers politely and distantly, the floor drops out all over again.
It wasn’t an illusion. A relapse isn’t a reset. It’s a data point. It shows exactly which part of the Identity Rebuild is still fragile, which scaffold is still load-bearing on her instead of on him. Painful information to gather, but valuable. The shame of relapsing — the I should be over this by now — does more damage than the relapse itself. It shuts down conversations with the friends who were helping. Pushes back into the isolation that created the dependency to begin with. When it happens — not if, when — treat it like a torn muscle mid-rehab. Not proof of failure. Information about what’s still healing.
Missing someone doesn’t stop all at once. It stops in layers — first the big things, then the small ones, then the things so subtle their absence wasn’t even noticed. One morning there’s a realization: a whole day went by without thinking of her, and the realization feels like grief and freedom in equal measure.
The Proof: What Attachment Research Actually Shows
Gary Lewandowski at Monmouth University has spent years studying what he calls “relationship self-expansion theory.” His core finding: relationships expand a person’s sense of self by adding new experiences, knowledge, and perspectives. When relationships end, those expansions go with them. The greater the share of identity that was relationship-derived, the more destabilizing the loss. Lewandowski’s research found people with high “relationship self-concept overlap” — those who’d most thoroughly merged identity with their partner’s — experienced significantly more distress and longer recovery times after breakups. Not because the love ran deeper. Because there was less self left to return to.
That’s the Identity Collapse mechanism, confirmed in a lab: the more of himself a man handed over to the relationship, the bigger the crash when it ends. Not proportional to how much she meant to him. Proportional to how much of him got constructed around her.
Sue Johnson, creator of Emotionally Focused Therapy and one of the most cited names in adult attachment science, adds a complementary finding. Across hundreds of couples and individuals in distress, Johnson found the specific protest behaviors people run after a breakup — the late-night texts, the obsessive Instagram checking, driving past the old apartment — aren’t signs of weakness or pathology. They’re what Johnson calls attachment protest: the nervous system’s automatic attempt to reconnect with a lost attachment figure. The brain classified the ex as an attachment anchor, and when the anchor vanishes, it activates the same survival circuits it would for genuine existential threat. Protest behaviors are the nervous system trying to solve a survival problem the prefrontal cortex already knows isn’t solvable in that direction.
John Gottman’s research on relationship dissolution, mainly aimed at predicting divorce rather than recovery, identified a related pattern: the people who struggled most after relationships ended had organized their daily behavior primarily around the relationship rather than their own values and purpose. Gottman’s data showed men in particular lean heavily on romantic partnerships for social support and emotional regulation — often to the exclusion of friendships and other support structures. Not a character flaw. The predictable result of cultural conditioning that discourages men from building the kind of emotionally substantive friendships that could’ve served as a buffer when the primary relationship failed.
The recovery data is clear: men who maintained independent friendships, independent pursuits, and independent purpose during their relationships recovered from breakups significantly faster and more completely than men who let those things atrophy around the relationship. Not about emotional armor or not caring. About having a self that exists independent of the relationship — a self the relationship enriched but didn’t create.
The myth of closure gets thoroughly dismantled by this research. Closure will feel wanted. There’ll be a conviction that one more conversation — if she’d just explain why, if the unsaid things could finally get said — would resolve the pain into something manageable. That conversation doesn’t exist. Not because she wouldn’t have it. Maybe she would. But closure isn’t something another person can hand over. It’s the moment the internal narrative shifts from something was taken from me to something ended, and I survived it, and the surviving changed me into someone who doesn’t need the explanation anymore. No conversation produces that shift. What produces it is slow, accumulating evidence of being able to exist fully — presently, without apology — in the absence of what once seemed necessary. The meaning lives in what gets built after she leaves, not in understanding why she left.
The Hard Truth: What You’re Actually Grieving
The man on that porch felt complete. Not because the sunset was pretty or the wine was good or because silence between two people carries inherent meaning. He felt complete because her presence confirmed his existence in a way nothing else in his life did. Work didn’t do it. Friends didn’t do it. His own internal sense of self didn’t do it. She did. She was the keystone. And pull the keystone from an arch, the whole thing comes down.
So the grief runs in layers. Surface layer: I miss the things we did together. Middle layer: I miss how I felt when I was with her. Bottom layer — the one most men would rather eat glass than examine: I miss the person I was when she made me feel like enough.
That bottom layer holds the real information. Buried in it is an admission most men would rather avoid entirely: the feeling of not being enough predates her. She didn’t create the deficit. She masked it. A warm, living, breathing bandage over a wound that existed long before they ever met — a wound that probably traces back to a father who was physically present and emotionally absent, or a childhood that taught worth was performance-based and withdrawn attention meant withdrawn love.
The relationship didn’t cause the wound. The breakup just ripped the bandage off.
Here’s where the standard advice turns actively harmful. Told to “move on” without examining that bottom layer, a man carries the wound intact into the next relationship. Finds a new woman who mirrors him back to himself, and for a while it works brilliantly — until she has a bad week and can’t give what’s needed, or he senses her pulling slightly away and the alarm fires at the same old intensity, and the response is the same anxious pattern that eroded the last relationship. The cycle repeats. Not because of bad choices in partners, but because the attachment architecture hasn’t changed.
The goal isn’t becoming someone who doesn’t want love. That’s the avoidant trap — the man who mistakes emotional numbness for strength, who says I don’t need anyone with the same desperate energy as the man who says I can’t live without her. Both are prisons. One’s just quieter.
The goal is building a self enhanced by love but not dependent on it. A self whose center of gravity is internal — anchored in values and practices and chosen direction — rather than external, anchored in someone else’s approval. A self able to receive love without collapsing into it. Able to lose love without collapsing without it.
This is the work. Not the gym. Not the new haircut. Not the dating app. The unglamorous, non-Instagrammable project of figuring out what matters when nobody’s watching — then organizing life around those values deliberately enough that identity anchors somewhere no other person can revoke. For a framework built around that kind of anchoring, the tools at the Resilient Wisdom mindset toolkit exist for exactly this: building the internal scaffolding that makes a man structurally independent of other people’s validation.
Here’s what’s on the other side, borne out by the pattern repeating enough times to trust it: the man who does this work — sitting in the discomfort rather than running, building the identity audit, reclaiming the territory, finding the real friendships, trading performance for construction — that man stops needing a phone screen at 2:47 a.m. Not because the ache disappears entirely. It’s still there sometimes, in diminishing waves that eventually blur into the normal pulse of being alive. But the ache stops running him.
He runs it.
The phone sits dark on the nightstand. And the man in the bed — whoever he’s turning into — is finally, completely, irreversibly his own.
Reader Questions About Stop Missing Honest: How to Stop Missing Your Ex
How long does it take to stop missing your ex? Research on breakup recovery suggests the acute phase — the sharpest neurochemical withdrawal — typically runs four to twelve weeks depending on how long the relationship lasted and how merged the identities became. But “stopping missing” isn’t a calendar date. It happens in layers. The first layer (missing daily rituals) fades within months. The deeper layer (missing who he was inside the relationship) doesn’t fade until an identity gets rebuilt that no longer needs that external confirmation. That process takes six to eighteen months of deliberate work. Men who actively run the Identity Rebuild recover measurably faster than men who simply wait. Gary Lewandowski’s research found people who engaged in self-concept reconstruction post-breakup showed better outcomes at three and six-month follow-ups than control groups given only time.
Is it normal to miss someone who treated you badly? Completely normal, and it reveals something important: the attachment wasn’t to how she treated him. It was to how he felt about himself when he was with her — even if that feeling arrived intermittently and hard-won. This is the core of anxious attachment patterns. Intermittent reinforcement — love that arrives unpredictably — actually builds stronger neurochemical dependency than consistent affection, because the brain’s reward system fires harder when reward is unpredictable. The good moments get missed more intensely because they were scarce. Withdrawal from a difficult relationship can hit harder than withdrawal from a good one. Not proof the relationship was secretly right. Proof the nervous system was well-trained.
Why do I miss my ex even when I know the relationship was wrong? Because the rational brain and the limbic system run different software. The prefrontal cortex has already compiled the evidence: incompatibility, recurring conflicts, things that wouldn’t have worked. The limbic system doesn’t care about evidence. It cares that a primary attachment figure is gone, and it generates distress proportional to the loss, not proportional to the quality of what was lost. Helen Fisher’s brain-scan research on rejected lovers showed full activation of dopaminergic craving systems even in subjects who intellectually knew the relationship had been damaging. Knowing it was wrong doesn’t switch off the withdrawal. It just supplies a frame for why the pain doesn’t match the intellectual assessment.
Does no contact actually help you stop missing your ex? No contact works because it removes the trigger inputs that reactivate the withdrawal cycle. Every check of her Instagram, every reread of old texts, every drive past a shared place delivers a hit of the lost supply — enough to restart the craving without ever satisfying it. No contact creates the space the neural map needs to update. What most no-contact advice misses: no contact is a precondition for recovery, not the recovery itself. Forty days of no contact with zero identity work resets everything back to day one the moment she’s spotted at a mutual friend’s birthday. The Identity Rebuild is what makes no contact permanent instead of just temporarily effective.
How do you stop thinking about your ex constantly? Thoughts don’t stop through suppression — the research on thought suppression (Wegner’s classic “don’t think about white bears” experiments) shows that trying not to think about something reliably increases its frequency. Instead: redirect the neural energy toward identity construction. Every time the thought shows up, treat it as a data point about which part of the Identity Rebuild still needs work. “I keep thinking about the trip we took” flags shared experience as something the current life lacks — a domain to rebuild. “I keep thinking about how she looked at me” flags feeling seen and wanted as a need not currently being met by any relationship with self or others. Use the thought as a diagnostic, not evidence she was irreplaceable.
Is missing your ex a sign you should get back together? Missing an ex is a sign the nervous system classified her as a primary attachment figure and is registering her absence as a threat. It says nothing about whether the relationship was actually good, long-term compatible, or worth rebuilding. Stan Tatkin’s work on couples shows the most distressed couples — highest conflict, most incompatibility, most damage inflicted on each other — often report the most intense missing after separation, because difficulty and emotional intensity create strong neural encoding. The intensity of missing is neurochemical, not logical. Before reading it as a sign, run the honest relationship audit: not the highlight reel, the full film, including everything that led to the end. The answer to reconciliation lives in that audit. Not in the intensity of the withdrawal.
Why does missing your ex feel physical? Because it is physical. Naomi Eisenberger’s research at UCLA using fMRI showed the anterior cingulate cortex — the region processing physical pain — activates identically during social rejection and physical injury. The brain doesn’t meaningfully distinguish a broken bone from a broken attachment. Add to that the loss of a nervous system co-regulator (per Tatkin’s work): the body now handles its own stress regulation without the external buffer it had adapted to. Elevated cortisol, disrupted sleep architecture, appetite changes, chest tightness — these aren’t metaphors for emotional pain. They’re the physiological signature of a body adjusting to losing a primary regulatory resource. The physical pain is real. It also resolves as the nervous system rebuilds independent regulation capacity.
What’s the difference between missing your ex and grieving the relationship? Grief is a healthy response to genuine loss — it processes the actual value of what ended and folds that loss into a broader narrative. Missing, when obsessive or prolonged, is often the Identity Collapse phenomenon at work: the grief isn’t primarily for her, it’s for the version of self that only existed in relation to her. The practical difference: grief fades over time as the loss gets integrated. Identity-Collapse-driven missing intensifies or holds steady until the underlying architecture gets addressed — until a self gets built that doesn’t need her presence to feel real. If the “missing” feels more like a loss of direction than a loss of a person, that’s Identity Collapse territory, and grief work alone won’t resolve it.
Related: The Mother Wound in Relationships: How She Shaped Every Woman You'll Love
Related: Trying to Be Confident Makes You Less Confident: The Paradox and the Way Out
Editorial StandardsCorrectionsMedical DisclaimerAbout Our ContentAffiliate DisclosureSite Map