Born a Crime by Trevor Noah — Full Book Summary and Review
Patricia Nombuyiselo Noah was walking home from church one Sunday morning when her husband Abel pushed her out of a moving vehicle and shot her twice. One bullet entered through her buttock and exited through her hip. The second went through her head and came out near her nostril. She was conscious. She was taken to a hospital. She survived. Shot through the head at close range, and she survived — which is either a medical miracle or confirmation of what everyone who knew Patricia Noah already understood: this woman was not going to be stopped by her husband, or by apartheid, or by anything else the world had arranged against her.
Trevor Noah tells this story near the end of Born a Crime, his memoir of growing up in South Africa during and after apartheid, and he tells it the way he tells everything in the book — with the humor of someone who’s processed the event so thoroughly that its absurdity and its horror can sit in the same sentence, and with the love of a son who knows his mother’s survival wasn’t an accident. Patricia Noah didn’t survive because the universe was kind. She survived because she’s the kind of person who was never built to be stopped, and the book itself — through the life she lived and the son she raised to describe it — is the most compelling evidence available for what that kind of person can do when they decide to love someone into a future the world hadn’t yet agreed to permit.
Born a Crime was published in 2016, six years after Trevor Noah moved to New York and one year after he took over from Jon Stewart as host of The Daily Show. By the time most American readers encountered it, they knew Noah as a sharp, personable political commentator with a South African accent and an outsider’s clarity about American dysfunction. The memoir explains the outsider’s clarity. Explains, really, where that whole combination of warmth, intelligence, linguistic facility, and structural political insight came from. It all came from Patricia, and from the specific conditions she navigated and refused to be defeated by.
Key Lessons from Born a Crime
- Racial classification systems produce human absurdities that can only be fully understood from within them. Noah’s gift for explaining apartheid is the gift of someone who couldn’t be cleanly categorized by it, which gave him a vantage point pure insiders and pure outsiders couldn’t reach.
- Language is not just communication — it is membership, protection, and identity. Noah’s multilingualism was a deliberate strategic investment his mother made. The returns weren’t just social. On at least one occasion, they were the specific thing that prevented violence.
- Comedy is a technology for processing what cannot be directly absorbed. The humor in the book isn’t avoidance. It’s the tool that let a child survive genuinely dangerous circumstances by finding the angle of view from which they became comprehensible rather than overwhelming.
- Resilience is socially transmitted, not individually innate. Noah’s resilience was built by Patricia’s specific practices — the multilingual exposure, the cross-racial relationships, the educational investments, the absolute refusal to limit his possibilities. Given to him through deliberate, costly, sustained effort over years.
- Identity categories are real and constructed simultaneously. Apartheid proved categories could be enforced with lethal force. Noah’s experience proved that the person who understands them as constructions has degrees of freedom the person locked into a single category can’t access.
- Love as a practice is more powerful and more demanding than love as a feeling. Patricia’s love for Trevor wasn’t passive or sentimental. It was active, strategic, relentlessly maintained against forces actively working to limit what he could become. The kind of love that actually produces results.
- Poverty and social exclusion produce cycles of violence through specific mechanisms. Abel wasn’t a villain. He was a man shaped by specific social conditions that produced destructive behavior. The structural analysis and the moral accountability coexist.
- Being uncategorizable is a curse and an education simultaneously. The specific freedom that comes from belonging nowhere — from being too ambiguous for any single category to contain — is only a gift if the person inside the ambiguity develops the skills to use it.
Bottom Line on Born a Crime
Born a Crime is simultaneously one of the funniest books in the memoir genre and one of the most sober accounts of what systems of violent racial classification actually do to individual human lives. That combination — humor and sobriety, laughter and structural analysis — is what makes the book exceptional and not merely enjoyable. Trevor Noah learned early that laughter wasn’t just entertainment. It was survival technology. The book demonstrates exactly how that technology works.
The memoir is built around Patricia Noah, not Trevor, and that’s the right choice. Patricia is one of the most remarkable human beings you’ll encounter in any book. Not the story of a victim who persevered. The story of a strategist who worked a system she couldn’t change by finding every gap within it, and who transmitted that strategic intelligence to her son through a specific program of deliberate developmental investment rather than wishful thinking about his potential.
If the book has a limitation, it’s that it’s sometimes so committed to the comic register that the darkness it’s processing doesn’t get quite the weight it deserves. The Abel chapters correct for this. But some earlier sections — particularly those dealing with the physical dangers of township life — move through violence quickly, in ways the humor makes possible but the moral accounting might require dwelling in longer. A minor criticism of a book that earns its humor with precision and deploys it with genuine craft.
Core Idea
The title isn’t a metaphor. Under apartheid’s laws, sexual relations between a Black person and a white person were criminal. Noah’s father was a white Swiss-German man. His mother was a Black Xhosa woman. Their relationship was a criminal act, and his birth was evidence of it. Portions of his early childhood were spent hidden — literally, placed under a car seat when police passed, kept indoors when the risk of discovery was high. He was the product of a crime by definition, before he’d done anything at all.
But the core idea of the book isn’t about racial crime. It’s about how being born a crime — born into a category the system can’t fully process — can produce a person with capabilities the system’s cleanly categorized members can’t develop. The person who can’t be contained by a single identity learns to read every identity from the outside. The person who has to work through between worlds that can’t officially acknowledge each other develops a social intelligence not required of people whose social context is singular. The curse of uncategorizability — the isolation, the confusion, the specific danger of being wrong about which group you’re presenting yourself to — is also an education in the constructed nature of identity itself. Noah became a great comedian in part because his entire childhood was training in exactly the analytical distance from social performance that comedy requires.
Apartheid as System and as Absurdity
Noah has a gift for explaining complex systems through specific, human-scale illustrations, and the chapters dealing with apartheid’s logic are a masterclass in that gift. He doesn’t begin with statistics or policy history. He begins with what it meant, day by day, for a mixed-race child navigating a society that had, through bureaucratic regulation, decided exactly which water fountain you were allowed to drink from based on the precise shade of your skin.
Apartheid classified people into racial categories — white, Black, coloured (mixed race), Indian — and regulated virtually every aspect of social life based on those classifications. The result was a system of such elaborate, self-contradicting specificity that it required constant administrative improvisation to maintain. Noah, classified as coloured, occupied an ambiguous position — simultaneously privileged over Black South Africans and subordinated to white ones — a position that gave him, as he puts it, the experience of belonging nowhere, which turned out to be an asset because it meant he could move between communities that wouldn’t normally have access to each other.
He describes being hidden during apartheid’s final years — placed under a car seat when police passed, kept indoors when the risk of being seen was high. He describes the taxonomy of skin color governing social interactions in his neighborhood. All of it, with the humor of someone who’s processed it fully enough to see its genuine absurdity without losing sight of the genuine harm it caused. The laughter and the analysis arrive together. Neither works without the other. This is the specific skill growing up in apartheid South Africa gave him, and that made him, eventually, one of the most effective political communicators of his generation.
Patricia Noah: The Woman Behind the Book
If there’s a single reason to read Born a Crime beyond its entertainment value and political insight, it’s Patricia Noah. She’s the book’s moral center, its emotional core, one of the most extraordinary portraits of a parent in the memoir genre. Not a saint — the book is honest about the tensions between them, the specific ways her determination to shape him produced friction with the independence she was also trying to cultivate in him. But a person of such clarity about what she was doing and why that the portrait becomes something close to a manual.
Patricia was a Xhosa woman who grew up in Soweto, and from a very young age had a relationship with God that was less doctrinal than strategic — she prayed with the specificity and directness of someone who understood prayer as a technology for getting things done. She worked domestic jobs, ran small enterprises, educated herself, raised a son as a single parent in one of the most structurally hostile environments for single mothers imaginable. Did it without complaint and with extraordinary intentionality about what she was building and what it required.
Her approach to raising Trevor rested on a conviction that was almost militantly optimistic: her son would not be limited by the conditions he was born into. Not magical thinking — a deliberate program of exposure. To books, to languages, to people across the racial and class spectrum, to experiences outside the township that most township children never got. She drove him to white suburbs. Took him to church services across multiple denominations, in multiple languages, because she wanted him to understand the world was larger than the category system apartheid imposed. She believed with complete certainty that this exposure would matter. She was right, in ways neither of them could have specified in advance but the book documents with the precision of retrospect.
The Language Superpower
One of the book’s most practically instructive themes is language — specifically, how Noah’s multilingualism became both a social superpower and a philosophical tool for understanding identity as construction rather than fate.
He grew up speaking Xhosa, Zulu, Sotho, Afrikaans, and English. His mother made this possible, understanding that in a country with eleven official languages, each functioning as a tribal identity marker, the ability to speak someone’s language was the ability to enter their world. She was right in a way with immediate, concrete consequences: Noah describes a confrontation he was able to exit by switching into Zulu when surrounded by a group of Zulu young men about to beat him for being coloured. The language switch signaled solidarity — he was one of them, in the way that mattered most in that moment — and the violence dissipated. Not a small thing. Language as literal survival technology.
He extends this into a broader principle running throughout the book: the ability to inhabit multiple identity frameworks simultaneously, rather than being locked into a single one, is both a social tool and a kind of freedom. Identity categories are real — apartheid proved the government could impose them with lethal force — but they’re also constructions, and the person who understands them as such has capabilities the person locked into a single construction doesn’t. Not relativism. Noah isn’t suggesting identity categories are arbitrary or that the harm they cause is imaginary. He’s suggesting the categories are human-made, which means they’re human-revisable, and the person who understands them as such has more degrees of freedom navigating them than the person who takes them as given.
The Township and the Comedy
The childhood chapters — the neighborhood entrepreneurship, the school adventures, the various schemes and near-disasters that made up ordinary life in Soweto — are where the book is funniest, and the humor is doing real work beyond entertainment. Noah is processing genuinely frightening experiences through comedy, the oldest human mechanism for transforming what’s overwhelming into what’s manageable.
The entrepreneurship section is particularly good. As a teenager, Noah ran a small business burning CDs and selling them in the township — technically illegal, socially normalized commerce that taught him supply chain management, customer relations, and the gap between legal and legitimate that gets navigated in every informal economy in the world. He describes it with the comic specificity of someone who found his own adolescent self-importance genuinely funny in retrospect, and who also recognizes the skills he was developing were real even when the enterprise wasn’t quite respectable.
But the comedy coexists with real danger — the township Noah grew up in was violent in the specific ways extreme poverty, unemployment, and deliberately maintained social underdevelopment produce. People he knew died. Situations that began as ordinary adolescent adventures tipped into genuine danger with a speed that reflected the precariousness of the social environment. Noah survived through a combination of the social skills his mother had cultivated in him, quick thinking, and luck. The book is honest that the luck was significant. Not everyone with his intelligence and social skills made it out. Some were simply in the wrong place at the wrong time, and the book honors that reality by not pretending his success was purely the product of his own capabilities.
What Born a Crime Gets Right
Born a Crime is exceptional in its structural analysis of race and identity combined with its refusal to reduce anyone in the story — Abel included — to a simple moral category. The book treats its characters as people produced by specific conditions and making choices within those conditions, rather than as representatives of moral positions. Harder to do than it sounds, particularly when the conditions are as extreme as apartheid and its aftermath, and particularly when some of the choices produced real harm.
The comedy itself is a genuine achievement. Noah demonstrates throughout that humor isn’t the avoidance of darkness but a specific angle of approach to it — one that makes the darkness visible precisely because it reveals the absurdity the darkness itself depends on. Apartheid was monstrous. It was also, in the specific ways all systems of bureaucratic racial classification must be, genuinely absurd — requiring constant administrative improvisation, producing contradictions no legislation could resolve, governing behavior no government has any legitimate business governing. The humor isn’t a distraction from the horror. It’s a description of the horror’s specific character.
The portrait of Patricia is one of the great parental portraits in memoir literature. Fully human — not a saint, not a perfect mother, not always right in her specific choices. Someone who understood what she was doing and why, and did it with remarkable consistency against remarkable odds. The book earns its tribute to her by making her specific rather than symbolic.
What the Book Gets Wrong (or Leaves Unresolved)
The book is not a comprehensive account of post-apartheid South Africa’s political economy, and it does not try to be. The chapters dealing with the ANC government and the specific disappointments of the post-1994 transition are relatively brief and largely absent from the narrative. Readers looking for a political analysis of how South Africa navigated the aftermath of apartheid will need other accounts.
The treatment of Noah’s relationship with his father Robert — the Swiss-German man whose relationship with Patricia produced Trevor — is notably thin. Robert appears briefly and somewhat warmly, but the relationship doesn’t get examined with the depth Patricia’s or Abel’s do. Whether that reflects the actual depth of the relationship or a deliberate narrative choice is unclear, but the absence is noticeable in a book so committed to honest accounting of the relationships that formed him.
The PATRICIA Protocol — Building Resilience in Someone Else
- P — Provide exposure the environment does not automatically offer. Patricia drove Trevor to white suburbs, to multi-denomination churches, to experiences township life didn’t provide. Exposure isn’t passive. It’s a deliberate investment in broadening the world a child believes is available to them.
- A — Assert their potential before the world has confirmed it. Patricia’s conviction that her son wouldn’t be limited by his circumstances wasn’t based on evidence — it was a foundational premise shaping every subsequent decision. Children raised with that premise internalize it. It becomes their premise too.
- T — Teach the language of every world they will need to work through. Literally, in Patricia’s case. But the principle extends to all forms of cultural fluency. The person who can speak the language of every world they need to work through has access monolingual people — linguistically or culturally — can’t reach.
- R — Refuse the limitations the system imposes as if they were natural. The apartheid system defined what was possible for a coloured child in South Africa. Patricia proceeded as if the system’s definitions were provisional obstacles rather than permanent facts. Not delusion. Strategic defiance.
- I — Invest in relationships across every social line available. Patricia’s church-going across denominations, her navigation of racial and class lines in her own social world, modeled for Trevor the practice of maintaining relationships outside your assigned category. These relationships aren’t nice to have. They’re the actual substance of social capital.
- C — Cultivate comedy as a processing tool, not a defense mechanism. The humor of the Noah household wasn’t an avoidance of difficulty. It was a specific technology for engaging with difficulty in a way that maintained the family’s sense of agency within circumstances they couldn’t control.
- I — Instill the knowledge that identity is chosen, not assigned. Not in the naive sense that apartheid could be wished away. In the precise sense that within the constraints of imposed categories, there’s always more room for self-determination than the system intends to allow.
- A — Act as if love is a verb, not a noun. Patricia’s love was expressed through specific actions — the language lessons, the exposure program, the Sunday drives, the church-hopping — not through declarations. The actions were the love. The declarations were secondary.
“My mother learned how to manipulate the system. She knew what she wanted and went after it. She was determined not to let the world turn her son into a victim.”
Books Similar to Born a Crime
Long Walk to Freedom by Nelson Mandela — the definitive first-person account of South African history and the anti-apartheid movement from its most significant figure. Essential background for understanding the world Noah grew up in, told from a very different position within it.
Becoming by Michelle Obama — another memoir of identity construction against systemic resistance, with a similar central dynamic: a remarkable mother transmitting specific strategic capabilities to a child she refuses to let the system limit.
The Autobiography of Malcolm X — a more radical, more explicitly political version of the same project: using language, education, and structural analysis to construct an identity the system designed to make impossible. Instructive comparison about what different kinds of resistance produce.
Between the World and Me by Ta-Nehisi Coates — the American companion to Noah’s South African account. Both addressed to sons (or future sons), both honest about what systems of racial classification do to bodies and identities, both refusing consoling fictions about those systems’ character.
Small Island by Andrea Levy — fiction that does for post-war Caribbean migration to Britain what Noah’s memoir does for apartheid South Africa: makes visible the specific human experience of navigating a categorization system from within it, through characters specific enough to prevent the reader from keeping their distance.
Who Should Read Born a Crime
Read Born a Crime if you want to understand what systems of racial classification actually do to human lives — not in the abstract but in the specific texture of daily experience. Noah makes this visible in ways purely analytical accounts can’t, because he was inside the system and his gift is the precision with which he can describe the inside from the outside he eventually reached.
Read it if you’re a parent who wants a model of deliberate developmental investment — of treating the child in front of you as someone whose full potential your specific choices can either expand or constrain. Patricia Noah’s approach isn’t replicable in its specifics, which were shaped by her specific situation. But the underlying principles transfer.
Read it if you want to understand how comedy actually works as a cognitive and social technology — how it processes darkness rather than avoiding it, and how the specific form of intelligence it requires develops through exactly the kind of ambiguous, uncategorizable childhood Noah describes.
Integration — Applying the Book to Your Life
The most transferable insight in Born a Crime is about the relationship between exposure and possibility. Patricia Noah’s deliberate expansion of her son’s experiential world — the languages, the neighborhoods, the churches, the social circles outside their assigned category — wasn’t enrichment in the middle-class sense of adding extracurriculars to an already adequate foundation. It was foundation-building. The construction, before Trevor could construct it himself, of the belief that the world available to him was larger than the world the system had allocated.
The practice that translates most broadly: expand the world someone loves operates in before they know they need it expanded. Applies to parenting, obviously. Also applies to mentorship, management, and any relationship in which one person has more access to possibility than another. The expansion isn’t charity. It’s investment. The returns aren’t guaranteed. They’re, if Patricia Noah’s example means anything, more likely than the returns on not making the investment.
The second transferable insight is about language as the medium of belonging. In Noah’s account, speaking someone’s language — literally or culturally — is the act that transforms a stranger into something closer to kin, that converts a potentially hostile encounter into a navigable one, that opens the door default social categorization would have kept closed. The investment in becoming fluent in the languages — literal and cultural — of the worlds you need to work through isn’t a soft skill. It’s, as Noah’s specific survival demonstrates, sometimes the hardest and most consequential skill available.
Born Crime Summary: Your Questions Answered
Is the book about South Africa’s past or its present?
Both. The apartheid chapters deal with a political system that officially ended in 1994. But the consequences — in property distribution, educational quality, employment access, neighborhood structure — are present in South Africa today, and Noah is honest that the formal end of apartheid didn’t immediately or fully transform the material conditions it had produced. The book is a historical document and a present-tense analysis simultaneously.
How does Noah compare American racism to South African apartheid?
He draws the comparison directly, and the analysis is one of the book’s most politically useful sections. The American version was more psychologically covert and less administratively explicit. The South African version was more openly bureaucratic. Both produced similar outcomes through different mechanisms. The American system’s specific genius was making its racial hierarchy feel natural and inevitable rather than legislated. The South African system’s administrative explicitness made its constructed character impossible to ignore, which is why its end required international pressure the American system, more skilled at self-concealment, has not yet faced at equivalent scale.
What happened to Abel after the shooting?
He was prosecuted but received a suspended sentence — an outcome reflecting the specific failure of the South African justice system to treat domestic violence against Black women as a serious criminal matter. Patricia survived and continued her life. Abel’s subsequent trajectory isn’t extensively documented in the book, and Noah treats his appearance in the narrative as what it was: a man who made a catastrophic choice, whose responsibility for that choice doesn’t require converting him into a monster to be meaningful.
What is the most important thing the book teaches about racism?
That it’s not primarily about hate — it’s primarily about bureaucratic categorization in service of economic and political hierarchy. The people who administered apartheid weren’t all motivated by hatred. Most were motivated by the ordinary human desire to maintain the systems that benefited them. Understanding racism as a structural phenomenon rather than primarily a psychological one is the insight that makes Noah’s political commentary on American society as effective as it is. He can see the structure clearly because he grew up inside one of its most explicit versions.
Why does comedy work as a coping mechanism?
Because it requires a specific kind of cognitive distance — the ability to see the situation from outside itself — that also provides relief from the claustrophobia of being inside it. Comedy about apartheid doesn’t minimize apartheid. It reveals apartheid’s absurdity, which is a form of power over it. The system that can be laughed at has lost something, even if it’s lost nothing materially. What it’s lost is the last claim it makes on you: the claim that it’s inevitable and natural and right. Comedy says this is contingent, this is human-made, this is not a law of nature but a choice made by people who could have chosen otherwise. That observation is liberation, even when the material conditions it describes haven’t yet changed.
The Comedy Craft and Its Serious Function
Noah has spoken extensively in interviews about the craft of comedy, and Born a Crime provides the biographical context that makes that craft intelligible. Comedy, in the tradition Noah comes from — and in the specific circumstances of his childhood — wasn’t primarily entertainment. It was a social technology, a way of processing events too large or too painful or too absurd to be addressed directly without either collapse or explosion.
The apartheid chapters demonstrate this most clearly. The things Noah is describing — the literal criminalization of his own birth, systems of racial classification so elaborate they required bureaucratic maintenance, the absurdity of police enforcing bedroom laws — are genuinely monstrous. They’re also, in his rendering, genuinely funny. The two coexist without canceling each other because the humor isn’t denial. It’s recognition: yes, this happened, yes it was terrible, and yes it was so structurally absurd that laughter is the only honest response to the absurdity, even while the suffering was real.
This is the specific kind of comedy Black South African culture developed under conditions of sustained injustice — not comedy that transcends suffering by ignoring it, but comedy that processes suffering by finding the angle of view from which it becomes visible as the human-made absurdity it always was. The laughter doesn’t minimize the harm. It reveals the harm’s ultimate contingency — shows that what was done didn’t have to be done, that the world that produced it wasn’t inevitable, that the people who built it made choices, and those choices could, in principle, have been made differently. That revelation is a form of power over the system even when the system hasn’t yet changed.
The Mixed-Race Body as Existential Problem and Freedom
A theme running throughout Born a Crime but not always given its full weight is the specific experience of inhabiting a body the official classification system can’t cleanly process. Noah was, under apartheid, a coloured person — but a light-skinned coloured person who could pass as white in some contexts, as coloured in others, sufficiently ambiguous that other people’s responses to him were unpredictable in ways requiring constant situational reading.
He describes specific incidents where his apparent racial category shifted based on context — with his Black mother, he was Black; with his white father, or in a white neighborhood, the same physical appearance read as white or coloured. The fluidity was confusing and occasionally dangerous (the wrong reading in the wrong context could have serious consequences) and also, as he eventually understood it, liberating: the category system’s inability to fully contain him gave him a kind of freedom people more cleanly categorized didn’t have.
This experience of the body as a text read differently by different readers — and the resultant need to develop sophisticated awareness of how you’re being read in any given moment — is formative for Noah’s comedy in ways he’s articulated in other contexts. The comedian’s ability to see social dynamics from the outside, to notice the performance of identity most people inside the performance can’t see, is directly related to his childhood experience of being perpetually on the outside of every category offered to him. You learn to read the room when you’ve never fully been inside any room. The training was not comfortable. The capability it produced is extraordinary.
Post-Apartheid and the New Complications
The book’s later chapters deal with the post-apartheid South Africa Noah grew up into — a society where the legal structure of racial classification was dismantled but the economic and social reality of the classifications remained, baked into property values and educational quality and employment access in ways laws couldn’t quickly undo. The hope was real. The frustration was also real. The book holds both without resolving the tension between them, because the tension wasn’t resolved in the society, and pretending otherwise would have been dishonest.
Noah’s observations about the difference between American racism and South African racism are some of the most politically useful in the book — not because one is presented as worse or better than the other, but because the comparison illuminates what’s structurally specific to each system and what’s common to all systems of racial classification. The American version was more psychologically covert; the South African version was more administratively explicit. Both produced similar outcomes through different mechanisms. Understanding the mechanisms is necessary for thinking clearly about what addressing them actually requires, and Noah’s experience of both systems gives him a comparative vantage point most commentators on either system lack.
What Noah Built From What Patricia Built in Him
The epilogue to Born a Crime is not triumphant in the conventional sense. Noah doesn’t conclude with his arrival at The Daily Show or any other conventional marker of American success. He concludes with his mother’s survival and his own assessment of what her example made possible for him.
The lesson he draws isn’t about individual determination, though that’s present. It’s about love as a practice — the specific, daily, often unrewarded work of showing up for someone, of making choices that prioritize their development over your own comfort, of refusing the systems and institutions and cultural expectations that want to contain and limit the people you love. Patricia’s love for Trevor wasn’t passive or sentimental. It was active, strategic, relentlessly maintained against forces actively working to limit what he could become.
That model of love — love as a set of practices rather than a feeling, love as the sustained work of creating conditions for another person’s flourishing — is the book’s deepest lesson and the one most worth carrying forward. The specific conditions of apartheid South Africa won’t recur for most readers. But the fundamental challenge — how do you love someone well enough that your love actually helps them become who they’re meant to be, rather than who the world’s systems have decided they should be — is universal and perennial, and Noah’s mother’s answer to it is one of the most instructive available in the memoir genre. Also, importantly, not easy. Patricia paid an enormous price for loving her son the way she did. The book is honest about that price, honest about why she paid it, honest about what it produced. The production was Trevor Noah. The price was everything she had and more. She did not consider this a bad trade.
FROM THE LIBRARY ›
References
Editorial StandardsCorrectionsMedical DisclaimerAbout Our ContentAffiliate DisclosureSite Map