The Magic of Thinking Big, published in 1959, was Schwartz’s attempt to hand that insight over in its most practical, most teachable form. It became one of the bestselling self-development books of the twentieth century — more than five million copies sold as of its last major reporting — and its influence on how later generations of success literature thought about belief and self-concept in achievement is hard to overstate. Tony Robbins, Napoleon Hill, and plenty of others covered similar ground, but Schwartz’s treatment stands out for its simplicity, its directness, and its total focus on the practical question. Not why big thinking matters philosophically. How, specifically, to build it when your current default is small thinking. The book is a manual for expanding the operational size of your thinking. Everything in it serves that one purpose.
The Excuse Factory: Why People Think Small
Before Schwartz can teach big thinking, he has to account for small thinking — explain why people capable of much more consistently settle for much less, not through conscious choice but through habitual thought patterns that operate below the level of deliberate decision. He names the “excuse factory” as the core mechanism: the mental system continuously manufacturing plausible reasons why the ambitious goal isn’t achievable, why current circumstances are uniquely unfavorable, why others who succeeded had advantages you don’t have, and why the uncomfortable status quo is really the best that can be expected given your particular constraints.
The excuse factory’s most dangerous feature is how accurate and plausible most of its products actually are. Most excuses contain genuine truth. The person who says they can’t start the business because they lack capital is often genuinely undercapitalized. The person who says they can’t pursue the promotion for lack of credentials may genuinely lack them. The excuse factory doesn’t manufacture pure fiction. It manufactures selective truth — finds the real obstacle and treats it as a definitive barrier, while quietly ignoring the evidence that other people faced comparable or worse obstacles and found a way through or around anyway. The partial truth is what makes the excuse genuinely harder to challenge than a pure fiction would be, because challenging it feels like denying reality instead of just questioning an interpretation of it.
Schwartz names health excuses, intelligence excuses, age excuses, luck excuses, and circumstance excuses as the most common categories. Health excuses hold that physical limitation blocks achievement — which Schwartz rebuts with examples of people who’ve achieved extraordinary things from positions of severe physical limitation. Intelligence excuses hold that exceptional achievement requires exceptional intelligence — rebutted by the consistent evidence that measured intelligence is a weak predictor of success next to applied effort, persistence, and the quality of thinking habits. Age excuses hold that achievement requires either youth or experience you currently lack — which conveniently makes achievement impossible at literally any age, since youth is always past and experience always incomplete. The common thread across all of them is the function they serve: the psychological relief of a satisfying explanation for the gap between what’s achieved and what’s possible, while blocking any real examination of whether that explanation holds up against what other people have actually done from comparable starting points.
Believe You Can Succeed and You Will
The book’s first, foundational principle sits right in the chapter title: believe you can succeed, and you will. Most people either accept this too fast — as a familiar, somewhat vague motivational line — or reject it too fast, as an obvious overstatement, since believing you can succeed clearly doesn’t guarantee success regardless of circumstances. Schwartz’s actual argument is more specific and more defensible than the bumper-sticker version suggests: the causal chain isn’t belief → success directly. It’s belief → actions → outcomes. Belief produces actions that its absence doesn’t produce, and those actions, sustained over time, produce outcomes disbelief’s inaction never reaches.
The mechanism is exactly the one Robbins, Canfield, and the whole tradition of success psychology would later develop in more detail: beliefs function as self-fulfilling prophecies because they determine the actions taken, and the actions determine the outcome. Someone who believes they’ll succeed at a challenging goal takes the actions success requires — persists through early failure, finds and uses available resources, sustains effort over the duration needed. Someone who believes they’ll fail takes fewer, less committed actions — finds confirming evidence in every early setback, invests less energy in an outcome they don’t expect to achieve, abandons the effort the moment the first real difficulty confirms what they already believed. Same starting circumstances, same objective capability — dramatically different outcomes, depending on the operative belief. Not because belief is magic. Because belief determines the behavior that determines the outcome.
Schwartz’s prescription for building belief is practical and specific: associate with people who believe in possibility rather than limitation, feed your mind daily with evidence of human achievement rather than content that normalizes failure and smallness, talk about your goals in the future-tense positive rather than the conditional negative, and build the habit of thinking about specific ways things can work rather than specific reasons they might not. None of this is mystical. These are deliberate interventions in the cognitive environment that generates belief in the first place — the selection of inputs, associations, and thought habits that either build or erode the functional conviction that ambitious goals are actually achievable.
Think Big: The Specific Practice
The book’s most practically important contribution is how specific it gets about what thinking big actually means as a daily practice — what shows up in the specific decisions, conversations, and choices that make up ordinary life. Schwartz draws a careful line between two things that get confused: wishful thinking, which is imagining desirable outcomes without any commitment to the work required, and big thinking, which is the deliberate expansion of a vision combined with genuine intention to do what achieving it demands. The distinction matters because wishful thinking is free and produces nothing, while big thinking requires holding both the expansive vision and the demanding work at once.
The specific practices Schwartz prescribes: think “I will” rather than “I’ll try” — the difference between commitment and hedge; use action-oriented language rather than passive construction, everywhere; describe yourself, your work, and your plans in terms of their potential rather than their current state; ask “how can I give more?” in professional contexts instead of “how can I get what I’m owed?”; and consistently picture the ideal outcome of any situation before settling for the merely acceptable one that the current constraints seem to require. Each is a small behavioral change. The cumulative effect on the scale and quality of the mental world you actually inhabit — and from which your actions emerge — is not small at all.
The department store example is classic Schwartz pragmatism: two salespeople, equivalent skill, same market conditions. One thinks “how can I close this sale?” The other thinks “how can I build a relationship with this customer that produces not just this sale but ten future sales and referrals to their network?” These are fundamentally different cognitive activities. Invisible in any single transaction. But the compounding effect over a year of customer interactions produces dramatically different results. The first salesperson is optimizing for the transaction. The second is optimizing for something much larger and much more valuable, and the specific things they do in any given interaction — how they listen, what they ask, what they offer, how they follow up — reflect that different target in ways that stack up into genuinely different career trajectories.
The Environment Action: Managing Your Thinking Environment
The prescription is direct, and its social cost is real: choose your associates deliberately, paying attention to the quality of their thinking and not just the comfort of their company. That means less time with people who consistently reinforce smallness, complaint, and limitation — even likeable people, even family, even relationships with a long history — and more time with people thinking at the level you want to reach, pursuing the kind of goals you want to pursue, whose conversation leaves you feeling expanded rather than shrunk. Not a call to abandon relationships or go ruthlessly transactional about who gets your time. Just a recognition that the cognitive environment you live in matters as much as the physical and professional one, and you have more influence over it than most people ever bother to exercise.
Schwartz extends the same logic to content: what you read, listen to, and watch daily is either building or eroding your capacity for big thinking. Someone whose information diet runs mostly on catastrophe-and-conflict news, smallness-normalizing entertainment, and social content built for endless comparison against other people’s curated highlight reels is not living in an environment conducive to ambitious possibility. Deliberately building a content environment — where the majority of inputs are stories, ideas, and examples of human achievement — is one of the most accessible, and most consistently skipped, investments available in the quality of your own thinking.
Defeat Defeatism: The Management of Fear and Doubt
The replacement is the action habit — the discovery Schwartz treats as one of the most reliable, best-supported principles in the whole book: action cures fear, inaction incubates it. Fear of doing something — starting the business, making the call, having the hard conversation, chasing the ambitious goal — peaks before the action gets taken. Once it begins, the fear loses its grip, not because circumstances changed but because taking action creates a different relationship with the feared thing than passively thinking about it ever could. Someone afraid to make sales calls who makes ten of them discovers the fear was substantially bigger than the reality — most calls weren’t as bad as expected, rejection didn’t hurt as much as feared, and having made the calls builds a foundation for the next set that passive contemplation never builds. Action is the cure. No amount of thinking-about-acting substitutes for it.
The second piece of defeatism management is the deliberate development of what Schwartz calls the “courage habit” — doing things that feel somewhat uncomfortable, with just enough regularity that the baseline of comfortable action gradually widens. Not a prescription for constant extreme discomfort or reckless risk. Just the recognition that your comfortable range expands through use and contracts through avoidance — that consistently acting at the edge of your comfort zone leaves your comfortable range substantially bigger, over time, than staying inside it ever would. The expansion isn’t dramatic day to day. Over years, it produces a qualitatively different person, with a qualitatively different range of available action.
Think Big in Human Relations
The section applying big thinking to human relationships gets skipped by a lot of readers chasing the career and achievement content, but it holds some of Schwartz’s most practically valuable insights. His central observation: the person who thinks small in human relations — stingy with recognition, quick to find fault, slow to express appreciation, focused on extracting value from relationships rather than contributing to them — isn’t just unattractive as a person. They’re running a fundamentally impoverished social strategy that will systematically limit their professional and personal effectiveness in ways they may never connect back to their own interpersonal style.
The big thinker in human relations runs on a specific, distinctive set of habits: genuinely and specifically generous with recognition, regularly acknowledging others’ contributions in ways personal and particular rather than generic and obligatory. Thinking of others in terms of their potential rather than their current performance. Extending trust by default instead of withholding it until it’s earned. Investing in relationships across every level of an organization or community rather than pouring relational investment exclusively into whoever’s currently powerful or useful. None of this is merely a social virtue. These are operational advantages in a world where the most important resources — information, opportunities, cooperation, advocacy — flow mostly through human relationships, and where the person known as generous, appreciative, genuinely interested in others’ success has access those focused on extraction simply don’t.
The Practical Daily Regimen
The book closes with a practical daily regimen for maintaining big-thinking habits against the constant cultural pressure toward smallness. Not complex, and the simplicity is part of the value — complex systems requiring elaborate implementation collapse under their own weight. The daily practices Schwartz recommends are achievable by almost anyone and, sustained consistently, produce the gradual cognitive shift toward bigger and bigger thinking that’s the book’s fundamental promise.
The morning review: before the day starts, spend a few minutes reviewing your most important goals with the specific intention of identifying one action that moves meaningfully toward each of them, today. Not comprehensive planning — a daily reminder that the important things need a daily piece of attention, not occasional big efforts separated by long stretches of inattention. The conversation audit: periodically check the quality of your conversations — what percentage are about possibilities and solutions versus complaints and problems, what percentage build others up versus pull them down, what percentage leave you and whoever you’re talking to feeling larger than when the conversation started. The environmental check: notice who you’re spending time with and the quality of their thinking, and adjust toward people thinking at the level you want to reach.
The larger argument running underneath all of these specific practices isn’t really about success in the conventional sense of career achievement, financial accumulation, or social status — though those outcomes tend to follow naturally from the thinking habits the book cultivates. It’s about the quality of life available to someone who’s learned to think at the full scale of their actual potential, versus the diminished life that’s the inevitable result of small thinking most people never think to question. Big thinking isn’t a technique. It’s an orientation toward the full range of human possibility — one that says, against every limitation and every excuse, that what’s been done by human beings in similar or worse circumstances is evidence of what can be done, and that the real question is never whether the ambitious goal is achievable but whether you’re willing to do the thinking and the work required to achieve it. The magic, in the end, isn’t magic at all. It’s the reliable result of thinking that most people are capable of and most people never fully practice.
The Success Environment: Where You Do Your Best Work
The principle stretches beyond the physical workspace to the broader life environment too. The neighborhood you live in, the social events you attend, the cultural content you consume, the news sources you rely on — all of it contributes to the ambient message about what’s normal, what’s possible, what kind of person you are, and it shapes your thinking below the level of conscious deliberation. Schwartz was observing, with a gifted teacher’s intuitive precision, what environmental psychology would later document systematically: human thinking and behavior respond profoundly to environmental cues, and deliberately building an environment that supports big thinking isn’t a luxury or an affectation. It’s a practical strategy for maintaining the quality of thought ambitious achievement actually requires.
Acting Big: The Behavior That Precedes the Belief
The specific behaviors Schwartz names as most important for acting big: making eye contact with the directness of someone who believes they deserve to be heard; speaking at the measured pace and appropriate volume of someone who assumes their words are worth listening to; making decisions with the promptness of someone who trusts their own judgment, rather than the hedging delay of someone afraid to commit; and presenting themselves — dress, grooming, deportment — as the person they’re aspiring to become rather than the person they’re currently afraid of still being. None of these require the internal experience of confidence as a prerequisite. They can be adopted before the feeling shows up. And adopted consistently, they tend to generate the feedback — from the environment, from other people, from the person’s own nervous system — that gradually produces the feeling being expressed.
The Creativity of Big Thinking: Solutions That Small Thinking Misses
Schwartz makes an argument less often cited but possibly the most practically important one in the book: big thinking isn’t just more pleasant or more ambitious than small thinking. It’s more creative — it generates solutions, opportunities, and approaches small thinking systematically misses because it isn’t even looking in the domains where those solutions live. The small thinker hitting an obstacle looks for reasons the obstacle is insurmountable. The big thinker hitting the same obstacle looks for approaches that would make the obstacle irrelevant — a reframing of the problem that makes it disappear, a resource or relationship or creative combination that eliminates the constraint entirely, an alternative path to the same destination that bypasses the obstacle altogether.
The quality of thinking determines the quality of problem-solving, not just in the trivial sense that smarter people think better thoughts, but in the more fundamental sense that the scale of thinking determines the scale of the solution space actually searched. Small thinking searches a small solution space — the solutions visible from within its current constraints and assumptions. Big thinking searches a larger one — including approaches that require removing the constraints themselves, questioning assumptions the small thinker never questioned, and creatively combining resources and ideas the small thinker never assembled. That’s why people with similar intelligence and similar access to information often land on dramatically different solutions to the same problem — not differences in analytical capability, but differences in the scale and ambition of the thinking framing what kind of solution is even worth looking for.
Schwartz in Historical Context: 1959 and Now
Understanding The Magic of Thinking Big requires some appreciation for the moment it was written in. Late-1950s America was simultaneously a period of extraordinary economic expansion and extraordinary social conformity — a time when the middle-class professional got rewarded for fitting in, following procedure, optimizing within a system that rewarded compliance with incremental advancement, and when cultural pressure toward safety, security, and avoiding conspicuous ambition was, in many social environments, the dominant norm. Schwartz was writing against that grain. His counsel to think big, act big, believe big was a direct challenge to the implicit cultural message that appropriate modesty was the correct posture for most people in most situations.
Some of the book’s specific examples and prescriptions feel dated now — the professional contexts he references, the gendered assumptions baked into many of his illustrations, the specific forms of career ambition he holds up as models. But the core argument — that most people operate far below their actual potential because of internally held limitations that are cultural in origin and revisable in character — hasn’t become less relevant. If anything, the extraordinary pace of change in the modern economy, which makes the comfortable established career path far less available than it was in 1959, has made the ability to think in large, flexible, creative terms about what’s possible more important, not less. The book’s prescriptions for building that ability remain genuinely useful, because the limitations they address remain genuinely present — changed in specific form, not fundamental character.
The Measurement of Progress: How Big Are You Actually Thinking?
Schwartz closes with a practical self-assessment — questions designed to reveal, with some honesty, the actual scale of thinking currently running your own life and work. Not the scale you believe you’re applying. Not the scale you’re capable of under ideal conditions. The scale actually governing your daily decisions, your real conversations, your real behavior in the moments that matter most. The gap between what you’re capable of thinking and what you’re actually applying is the gap the whole book is designed to close. Naming that gap precisely is the prerequisite for closing it.
The questions: What’s the most ambitious goal you’ve seriously pursued this past year — and is it ambitious enough to actually be exciting? When did you last make a decision that required real courage — genuine risk of failure or rejection — rather than the comfortable choice available at no significant personal cost? What do your conversations sound like — mostly about possibilities, about what could be, about ambitious work in progress — or mostly complaints, other people’s failures, the constraints keeping you from what you want? What’s the quality of the people you spend the most time with — thinking at the level you want to reach, or reinforcing the smaller thinking you’re trying to move past?
Simple questions. Uncomfortable answers, often. That discomfort is the point. The book’s entire argument is that the gap between the life most people are living and the life they’re capable of living is a function of the scale of their thinking — and that scale isn’t fixed, isn’t determined by intelligence or circumstance, and is available for deliberate expansion through the specific practices the book describes. The magic, in the end, is simply this: thinking in larger terms about what’s possible produces, over time, genuinely larger outcomes — not because the universe rewards optimism, but because bigger thinking generates bigger action, and bigger action, sustained, produces the genuinely bigger results small thinking never reaches, because it never even attempts them.
The Enduring Relevance: Why Schwartz Still Matters
Why does a book published in 1959 keep getting read and recommended? Look at what it’s actually addressing — not the specific circumstances of 1959, largely gone now, but the specific human tendency toward small thinking, which hasn’t changed at all. If anything, the complexity and overwhelm of the modern information environment has made big thinking harder for a lot of people, not easier — made cultivating a clear, ambitious, expansive vision of what’s possible more effortful against the constant interruptions, comparisons, and distractions that make up daily life in the attention economy. The specific brakes Schwartz identified — the excuse factory, the small associations, the fear of being thought pretentious for wanting too much — are still operating, even if the specific mechanisms look a little different than they did in the 1950s.
The book’s enduring value is the clarity and specificity of its central message. Not “believe in yourself” as vague encouragement — the specific, empirically grounded argument that the size of your thinking is the primary variable in the size of your outcomes, and that the size of your thinking is a trainable characteristic, not a fixed personality trait. The training Schwartz describes — managing your thinking environment, acting big before feeling big, deliberately cultivating big thinking in every domain of daily life — is available to anyone, requires no special circumstances, and produces compounding returns over time that no single strategy or tactic can match. The magic was never in the thinking alone. It was always in the doing that big thinking makes possible and small thinking systematically prevents. Start there. Think bigger. Then act on it, every day, without exception. That’s been the message for sixty-five years. It hasn’t gotten less true.
Related: I Will Teach You to Be Rich Summary
Related: Team of Teams Summary
The Practical Framework: Applying Magic Thinking Big Summary In Real Life
NOT JUST READING ABOUT IT ›
Join the Wolf Pack — mentorship and accountability for men who are done thinking about change
References
Editorial StandardsCorrectionsMedical DisclaimerAbout Our ContentAffiliate DisclosureSite Map